Reliability-based design optimization of aeroelastic structures

被引:77
作者
Allen, M [1 ]
Maute, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Aerosp Struct, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
design optimization; first order reliability method; nonlinear aeroelasticity; stochastic analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-004-0384-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Aeroelastic phenomena are most often either ignored or roughly approximated when uncertainties are considered in the design optimization process of structures subject to aerodynamic loading, affecting the quality of the optimization results. Therefore, a design methodology is proposed that combines reliability-based design optimization and high-fidelity aeroelastic simulations for the analysis and design of aeroelastic structures. To account for uncertainties in design and operating conditions, a first-order reliability method (FORM) is employed to approximate the system reliability. To limit model uncertainties while accounting for the effects of given uncertainties, a high-fidelity nonlinear aeroelastic simulation method is used. The structure is modelled by a finite element method, and the aerodynamic loads are predicted by a finite volume discretization of a nonlinear Euler flow. The usefulness of the employed reliability analysis in both describing the effects of uncertainties on a particular design and as a design tool in the optimization process is illustrated. Though computationally more expensive than a deterministic optimum, due to the necessity of solving additional optimization problems for reliability analysis within each step of the broader design optimization procedure, a reliability-based optimum is shown to be an improved design. Conventional deterministic aeroelastic tailoring, which exploits the aeroelastic nature of the structure to enhance performance, is shown to often produce designs that are sensitive to variations in system or operational parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 242
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
ALLEN M, 2003, 16 AIAA COMP FLUID D
[2]   SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIOS, PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, AND TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, G .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1988, 30 (01) :1-17
[3]  
CAI XC, 1998, 10 INT C DOM DEC MET
[4]  
CESARE M, 1999, 40 AIAA ASME ASCE AH
[5]   A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors [J].
Chen, W ;
ALlen, JK ;
Tsui, KL ;
Mistree, F .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1996, 118 (04) :478-485
[6]  
Cornell C.A., 1969, J AM CONCRETE I, V66, P974, DOI [10.14359/7446, DOI 10.14359/7446]
[7]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[8]  
DeLaurentis L., 2000, P 38 AER SCI M EXH R, P2
[9]   RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION AS AN INFORMATION TOOL [J].
ENEVOLDSEN, I .
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 1994, 22 (01) :117-135
[10]   RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION IN STRUCTURAL-ENGINEERING [J].
ENEVOLDSEN, I ;
SORENSEN, JD .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1994, 15 (03) :169-196