Clinician percent syllables stuttered, clinician severity ratings and speaker severity ratings: are they interchangeable?

被引:17
作者
Karimi, Hamid [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Mark [3 ]
O'Brian, Sue [1 ]
Onslow, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Australian Stuttering Res Ctr, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
outcome measurement; stuttering; absolute reliability; relative reliability; ASSESSING AGREEMENT; RELIABILITY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12069
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background At present, percent syllables stuttered (%SS) is the gold standard outcome measure for behavioural stuttering treatment research. However, ordinal severity rating (SR) procedures have some inherent advantages over that method. Aims To establish the relationship between Clinician %SS, Clinician SR and self-reported Speaker SR. To investigate whether Clinician SRs and Speaker SRs can be used interchangeably. Method & Procedures Participants were three experienced speech-language pathologist (SLP) judges and 87 adults who stuttered. Adults who stuttered received a 10-min unscheduled telephone call at the conclusion of which they self-reported a SR using a nine-point scale. The SLPs measured the stuttering for these conversations with %SS and also with the SR scale. The mean scores for Clinician %SS and Clinician SR were compared with Speaker SR using appropriate indices of relative and absolute reliability. Relative reliability indices deal with the rank order of participants in a sample and whether they can be distinguished from each other. However, absolute reliability indices are related to the closeness of the measurement scores to each other and to a hypothetical true score. Outcomes & Results Strong correlations were found between Clinician %SS and Clinician SR, and also between Clinician %SS and Speaker SR, although with higher values in the former case. Additionally, very high correlations showed acceptable relative reliability between Clinician SR and Speaker SR. However, absolute reliability in terms of standard error of measurement and limits of agreement was poor for Clinician SR and Speaker SR. Conclusions & Implications The results suggest that Clinician SR and Speaker SR cannot be used interchangeably to measure temporal stuttering severity changes for an individual client. However, researchers might use these two measures interchangeably in research contexts, such as clinical trials, where changes of the entire group are of interest to determine and compare treatment effect size across trials.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 368
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, KINANTHROPOMETRY 8
[2]  
Aron M L, 1967, J S Afr Speech Hear Assoc, V14, P15
[3]   Reliability in evidence-based clinical practice:: a primer for allied health professionals (Reprinted from Physical Therapy in Sport, vol 1, pg 54-62, 2000) [J].
Batterham, AM ;
George, KP .
PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2003, 4 (03) :122-128
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   EVALUATING EFFICACY OF TREATMENT OF STUTTERING - SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN [J].
CONTURE, EG ;
GUITAR, BE .
JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 1993, 18 (2-3) :253-287
[6]  
Domholdt E., 2005, Rehabilitation research: principles and applications, V3rd
[7]   HOW MUCH CHANGE IS TRUE CHANGE? THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE BERG BALANCE SCALE IN ELDERLY PEOPLE [J].
Donoghue, Declan ;
Stokes, Emma K. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (05) :343-346
[8]   Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science [J].
Hopkins, WG .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (01) :1-15
[9]   The influence of communication situation on self-report in people who stutter [J].
James, Sarah ;
Brumfitt, Shelagh ;
Cowell, Patricia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) :34-44
[10]   Randomised controlled trial of the Lidcombe programme of early stuttering intervention [J].
Jones, M ;
Onslow, M ;
Packman, A ;
Williams, S ;
Ormond, T ;
Schwarz, I ;
Gebski, V .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7518) :659-661