Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery

被引:138
作者
Payne, B. Keith [1 ]
Vuletich, Heidi A. [1 ]
Brown-Iannuzzi, Jazmin L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Psychol, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
implicit bias; slavery; bias of crowds; prejudice; ASSOCIATION TEST; EXPLICIT PREJUDICE; SOCIAL COGNITION; SEX-DIFFERENCES; METAANALYSIS; ATTITUDES; RACE;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1818816116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Implicit racial bias remains widespread, even among individuals who explicitly reject prejudice. One reason for the persistence of implicit bias may be that it is maintained through structural and historical inequalities that change slowly. We investigated the historical persistence of implicit bias by comparing modern implicit bias with the proportion of the population enslaved in those counties in 1860. Counties and states more dependent on slavery before the Civil War displayed higher levels of pro-White implicit bias today among White residents and less pro-White bias among Black residents. These associations remained significant after controlling for explicit bias. The association between slave populations and implicit bias was partially explained by measures of structural inequalities. Our results support an interpretation of implicit bias as the cognitive residue of past and present structural inequalities.
引用
收藏
页码:11693 / 11698
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Acharya A., 2016, POLITICAL LEGACY AM
[2]   The Political Legacy of American Slavery [J].
Acharya, Avidit ;
Blackwell, Matthew ;
Sen, Maya .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2016, 78 (03) :621-641
[3]  
Alexander M., 2012, THE NEW JIM CROW
[4]   Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior [J].
Amodio, David M. ;
Devine, Patricia G. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (04) :652-661
[5]  
Anderson Carol., 2016, WHITE RAGE UNSPOKEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Categorically unequal: The American stratification system
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, TRULY DISADVANTAGED
[8]  
Banaji MR, 2001, SCI CON SER, P117
[9]   Implicit discrimination [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Chugh, D ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (02) :94-98
[10]   Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction [J].
Blanton, H ;
Jaccard, J ;
Gonzales, PM ;
Christe, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (02) :192-212