The relative effect of health literacy and patient activation on provider choice in the Netherlands

被引:36
作者
Rademakers, Jany [1 ]
Nijman, Jessica [1 ]
Brabers, Anne E. M. [1 ]
de Jong, Judith D. [1 ]
Hendriks, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] NIVEL Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Health literacy; Patient activation; Provider choice; Inequity; SHORT-FORM; MEASURE PAM13; CARE; PERFORMANCE; TRANSLATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.020
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Active provider choice by patients has become an important policy theme in western, countries over the last decades. However, not many patients and consumers exercise their right to, choose. Both health literacy and patient activation are likely to have an impact on the choice process. In, this article the relative effect of health literacy and patient activation on provider choice in the, Netherlands is studied. A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 2000 Dutch citizens. The questionnaire, included a measure of functional health literacy, the Dutch version of the Patient Activation Measure, and questions assessing active provider choice, reasons not to engage in it and other ways of provider, selection. The majority of respondents (59.6%) would not search for information on the basis of which they, could select the best provider or hospital. Most people rely on their general practitioner's advice. Both, low literacy and lower patient activation levels were negatively associated with active provider choice. In a regression analysis gender, education and patient activation proved the most important, predictors. The policy focus on active provider choice might result in inequity, with men, less educated, and less activated people being at a disadvantage. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 206
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Berwick DM, 2003, MED CARE S, V41, P130
[2]  
Brabers AEM, 2012, CONSUMENTENPANEL GEZ
[3]  
Dixon Anna, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P162, DOI 10.1258/135581906777641668
[4]  
Dixon Anna., 2010, Patient Choice: How patients choose and how providers respond
[5]   Access, choice and travel: Implications for health policy [J].
Exworthy, M ;
Peckham, S .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 40 (03) :267-287
[6]  
Fotaki M, 2010, EUROHEALTH, V11, P3
[7]   What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications [J].
Fotaki, Marianna ;
Roland, Martin ;
Boyd, Alan ;
McDonald, Ruth ;
Scheaff, Rod ;
Smith, Liz .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 (03) :178-184
[8]   Applicability of Internationally Available Health Literacy Measures in the Netherlands [J].
Fransen, M. P. ;
Van Schaik, T. M. ;
Twickler, T. B. ;
Essink-Bot, M. L. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 :134-149
[9]   Systematic review: The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care [J].
Fung, Constance H. ;
Lim, Yee-Wei ;
Mattke, Soeren ;
Damberg, Cheryl ;
Shekelle, Paul G. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (02) :111-123
[10]   Are the assumptions underlying patients choice realistic?: a review of the evidence [J].
Greener, Ian .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 83 (01) :249-258