Prognostic Significance of Adenocarcinoma In Situ, Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma, and Nonmucinous Lepidic Predominant Invasive Adenocarcinoma of the Lung in Patients With Stage I Disease

被引:211
作者
Kadota, Kyuichi [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Villena-Vargas, Jonathan [1 ]
Yoshizawa, Akihiko [7 ]
Motoi, Noriko [8 ]
Sima, Camelia S. [3 ]
Riely, Gregory J. [4 ]
Rusch, Valerie W. [1 ]
Adusumilli, Prasad S. [1 ,5 ]
Travis, William D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Div Solid Tumor Oncol, Thorac Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Ctr Cell Engn, New York, NY 10065 USA
[6] Kagawa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760, Japan
[7] Shinshu Univ Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
[8] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
recurrence; adenocarcinoma in situ; lung adenocarcinoma; minimally invasive adenocarcinoma; lepidic; IASLC/ATS/ERS HISTOLOGIC CLASSIFICATION; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; GROUND-GLASS OPACITY; INTERNATIONAL-ASSOCIATION; LIMITED RESECTION; GRADING SYSTEM; EGFR MUTATIONS; INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR; COMPETING RISKS; TUMOR SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0000000000000134
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification, the lepidic predominant pattern consists of 3 subtypes: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. We reviewed tumor slides from 1038 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, recording the percentage of each histologic pattern and measuring the invasive tumor size. Tumors were classified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: 2 were AIS, 34 MIA, and 103 lepidic predominant invasive. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was used to estimate the probability of recurrence. Patients with AIS and MIA experienced no recurrences. Patients with lepidic predominant invasive tumors had a lower risk for recurrence (5-y CIR, 8%) than nonlepidic predominant tumors (n=899; 19%; P=0.003). Patients with > 50% lepidic pattern tumors experienced no recurrences (n=84), those with > 10% to 50% lepidic pattern tumors had an intermediate risk for recurrence (n=344; 5-y CIR, 12%), and those with <= 10% lepidic pattern tumors had the highest risk (n=610; 22%; P < 0.001). CIR was lower for patients with <= 2 cm tumors than for those with > 2 to 3 cm tumors (for both total and invasive tumor size), with the difference more pronounced for invasive tumor size (5-y CIR, 13% vs. 21% [total size; P=0.022] and 12% vs. 27% [invasive size; P < 0.001]). Most patients with lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma who experienced a recurrence had potential risk factors, including sublobar resection with close margins (<= 0.5 cm; n=2), 20% to 30% micropapillary component (n=2), and lymphatic or vascular invasion (n=2). It therefore may be possible to identify lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas that carry a low or high risk for recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 460
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]   Histopathologic prognostic factors in resected adenocarcinomas - Is nuclear DNA content prognostic? [J].
Asamura, H ;
Ando, M ;
Matsuno, Y ;
Shimosato, Y .
CHEST, 1999, 115 (04) :1018-1024
[3]   MITOSIS COUNTING IN TUMORS [J].
BAAK, JPA .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1990, 21 (07) :683-685
[4]   Prognostic Significance of Grading in Lung Adenocarcinoma [J].
Barletta, Justine A. ;
Yeap, Beow Y. ;
Chirieac, Lucian R. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (03) :659-669
[5]  
Borezuk AC, 2009, AM J SURG PATHOL, V33, P462, DOI 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318190157c
[6]   Competing Risk Analyses: How Are They Different and Why Should You Care? [J].
Chappell, Rick .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (08) :2127-2129
[7]   The Use and Interpretation of Competing Risks Regression Models [J].
Dignam, James J. ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Kocherginsky, Masha .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (08) :2301-2308
[8]   The National Lung Screening Trial: Overview and Study Design [J].
Gatsonis, Constantine A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 258 (01) :243-253
[9]  
Gooley TA, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P695, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-F