Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Indonesian version of the Oswestry Disability Index

被引:3
作者
Phedy, Phedy [1 ]
Djaja, Yoshi Pratama [1 ]
Tobing, Singkat Dohar Apul Lumban [2 ]
Gatam, Luthfi [1 ]
Librianto, Didik [1 ]
Fachrisal [1 ]
Gatam, Asrafi Rizki [1 ]
Hardiansyah, Nicko Perdana [3 ]
机构
[1] Fatmawati Cent Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Jl Fatmawati 1, Jakarta, Dki Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Rumah Sakit Cipto Mangunkusumo, Dept Orthoped, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Soelianti Saroso Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; Cross-cultural adaptation; Indonesian; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CHINESE VERSION; GERMAN VERSION; PART; RELIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; INSTRUMENTS; QUALITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-020-06690-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most common patient-reported outcome measures used for low back pain (LBP). Since it was not available in Indonesian, this study aimed to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of ODI to Indonesian and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods We performed a cross-cultural adaptation of ODI v2.1a into Indonesian language (ODI-ID) and determined its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, confirmatory factor analysis, floor-ceiling effect, and construct validity by hypotheses testing of its correlation with Short Form-36 (SF-36) and visual analog scale (VAS). Adults (> 17 years of age) diagnosed with low back pain were included. Results A total of 96 subjects were included in this study. The original ODI questionnaire was translated into an Indonesian version and showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and good reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.97). The standard error of measurement values of 3.35 resulted in a minimal detectable change score of 9. Nine out of nine (100%) a priori hypotheses were met, confirming the construct validity. A strong correlation was found with the physical component of SF-36 (0.77 and 0.76 for pain and physical function, respectively) and VAS (0.79). Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a poor but significant fit to the original one-factor structure and the static-dynamic two-factor structure. Floor-ceiling effects were not found. Conclusions The Indonesian version of ODI displayed similar reliability, validity, and psychometric characteristics to the original ODI. This questionnaire will be a suitable instrument for assessing LBP-related disability for Indonesian-speaking patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1062
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Difficulties in using Oswestry Disability Index in Indian patients and validity and reliability of translator-assisted Oswestry Disability Index [J].
Aithala, Janardhana P. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
[2]  
Algarni A. S., 2014, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, V57, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.06.006
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, STANDARD SET LOW BAC
[4]   Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures [J].
Anthoine E. ;
Moret L. ;
Regnault A. ;
Sbille V. ;
Hardouin J.-B. .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12 (1)
[5]   Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine [J].
Atkinson, G ;
Nevill, AM .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (04) :217-238
[6]   Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Guillemin, F ;
Ferraz, MB .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3186-3191
[7]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[8]   MEASURING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 4 DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BEURSKENS, AJ ;
DEVET, HC ;
KOKE, AJ ;
VANDERHEIJDEN, GJ ;
KNIPSCHILD, PG .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (09) :1017-1028
[9]   Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[10]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160