Relationality and Commitment: Ethics and Ontology in Heidegger's Aristotle

被引:3
作者
Knudsen, Nicolai Krejberg [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Philosophy & Hist Ideas, Bldg 1465-530,Jens Chr Skousvej 7, DK-8800 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Heidegger; Aristotle; ethics; relationality; communication; commitment; DESTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1080/00071773.2019.1574218
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This article discusses the tension between social relationality and self-relationality central to Heidegger's ontology of Dasein and the possible ways of reconciling this tension. Arguing that this is a tension between communicability and existential commitments, the article poses the question: How are existential commitments responsive to communication? After problematizing the quasi-Kantian and communitarian ways of settling the tension, the article uses Heidegger's early reading of Aristotle to develop a third hermeneutic model of ethical relationality according to which existential commitments are shareable in communication, since ethos - the existential posture towards the good - arises out of pathos that exposes Dasein to coexistence. The account of ethical relationality found in Heidegger's interpretation of Aristotle thus takes the world to be a shared and dynamic ontological condition and emphasize that the world constitutes selfhood in a way that is constantly at stake in ethical communication.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 357
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, SEIN ZEIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, PROLEGOMENA GESCH ZE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, HAVING THOUGHT
[5]  
Benjamin Andrew, 2017, VIRTUE BEING ETHICS
[6]   HEIDEGGER DESTRUCTION OF PHRONESIS [J].
BERNASCONI, R .
SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1990, 28 :127-147
[7]  
Blattner W., 1999, HEIDEGGERS TEMPORAL
[8]   HEIDEGGER DESTRUCTION OF PHRONESIS - RESPONSE [J].
BROGAN, W .
SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1990, 28 :149-153
[9]  
Brogan WalterA., 2005, HEIDEGGER ARISTOTLE
[10]  
Buber Martin., 2002, MAN MAN