Association between airborne PM2.5 chemical constituents and birth weight-implication of buffer exposure assignment

被引:36
作者
Ebisu, Keita [1 ]
Belanger, Kathleen [2 ]
Bell, Michelle L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2014年 / 9卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
air pollution; environmental epidemiology; low birth weight; environmental health; PM2.5; AMBIENT AIR-POLLUTION; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; FULL-TERM INFANTS; PARTICLE COMPOSITION; MATERNAL EXPOSURE; PRETERM BIRTH; COMPONENTS; CALIFORNIA; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/9/8/084007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Several papers reported associations between airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and birth weight, though findings are inconsistent across studies. Conflicting results might be due to (1) different PM2.5 chemical structure across locations, and (2) various exposure assignment methods across studies even among the studies that use ambient monitors to assess exposure. We investigated associations between birth weight and PM2.5 chemical constituents, considering issues arising from choice of buffer size (i.e. distance between residence and pollution monitor). We estimated the association between each pollutant and term birth weight applying buffers of 5 to 30 km in Connecticut (2000-2006), in the New England region of the USA. We also investigated the implication of the choice of buffer size in relation to population characteristics, such as socioeconomic status. Results indicate that some PM2.5 chemical constituents, such as nitrate, are associated with lower birth weight and appear more harmful than other constituents. However, associations vary with buffer size and the implications of different buffer sizes may differ by pollutant. A homogeneous pollutant level within a certain distance is a common assumption in many environmental epidemiology studies, but the validity of this assumption may vary by pollutant. Furthermore, we found that areas close to monitors reflect more minority and lower socio-economic populations, which implies that different exposure approaches may result in different types of study populations. Our findings demonstrate that choosing an exposure method involves key tradeoffs of the impacts of exposure misclassification, sample size, and population characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Health effects of ambient air pollution: Do different methods for estimating exposure lead to different resifts?
    Sellier, Yann
    Galineau, Julien
    Hulin, Agnes
    Caini, Fabrice
    Marquis, Nathalie
    Navel, Vladislav
    Bottagisi, Sebastien
    Giorgis-Allemand, Lise
    Jacquier, Claire
    Slama, Remy
    Lepeule, Johanna
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 66 : 165 - 173
  • [42] Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stieb, David M.
    Chen, Li
    Eshoul, Maysoon
    Judek, Stan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 117 : 100 - 111
  • [43] US Census Bureau, 2009, AM COMM SURV 2009 5
  • [44] US EPA, 2009, EPA600R08139F
  • [45] US EPA, 2011, AIR EXPL 2010
  • [46] US EPA, 2011, AIR QUAL SYST 2010
  • [47] Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA
    Wilhelm, M
    Ritz, B
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (09) : 1212 - 1221
  • [48] Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and reproductive health
    Woodruff, Tracey J.
    Parker, Jennifer D.
    Darrow, Lyndsey A.
    Slama, Remy
    Bell, Michelle L.
    Choi, Hyunok
    Glinianaia, Svetlana
    Hoggatt, Katherine J.
    Karr, Catherine J.
    Lobdell, Danelle T.
    Wilhelm, Michelle
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 109 (03) : 311 - 320
  • [49] Fine particulate air pollution and its components in association with cause-specific emergency admissions
    Zanobetti, Antonella
    Franklin, Meredith
    Koutrakis, Petros
    Schwartz, Joel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2009, 8