Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer

被引:1
|
作者
De Felice, C. [1 ]
Cipolla, V. [1 ]
Guerrieri, D. [1 ]
Santucci, D. [1 ]
Musella, A. [2 ]
Porfiri, L. M. [1 ]
Meggiorini, M. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Sapienza, Dept Radiol Sci, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Rome Sapienza, Dept Gynaecol Sci, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Invasive breast cancer; Grading; Ki67; MRI; RECOMMENDATIONS; PROLIFERATION; METAANALYSIS; PRINCIPLES; SURVIVAL; SUBTYPES; MARKERS; FAT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) provided by 3.0 Tesla diffusion-weighted imaging (3T DWI) varies with the prognostic factors 1(167 and grading in invasive breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Seventy-three patients with 75 invasive breast cancer lesions who had undergone 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local staging were enrolled. All lesions were confirmed by histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. MRI included both dynamic contrast-enhanced and DWI sequences. ADC value was obtained for each lesion. Histologic tumor grade was established according to the Nottingham Grading System (NGS), while 1(167 expression was evaluated by MM1 clone IgG1 mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody. Patients were divided into the following groups: grade 1 (G1), grade 2 (G2), grade 1 plus grade 2 (G1+G2) and grade 3 (G3), and low Ki67 (<= 14%), intermediate Ki67 (15%-30%), and high Ki67 (>= 30%). ADC values were compared with the G and Ki67 groups. Statistical comparison was carried out using the Mann-Whitney U and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Results: ADC values were significantly higher in G3 than in G1+G2 tumors; no significant difference was observed when G1, G2, and G3 were compared. There was no statistically significant correlation between ADC values and Ki67 percentage (p>0.05). Discussion: ADC values obtained on 3T DWI correlate with low (G1+G2) and high-grade (G3) invasive breast carcinomas. Conclusion: ADC may be a helpful tool for identifying high-grade invasive breast carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 414
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors
    Belli, Paolo
    Costantini, Melania
    Bufi, Enida
    Giardina, Giuseppe Giovanni
    Rinaldi, Pierluigi
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2015, 120 (03): : 268 - 276
  • [2] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors
    Paolo Belli
    Melania Costantini
    Enida Bufi
    Giuseppe Giovanni Giardina
    Pierluigi Rinaldi
    Gianluca Franceschini
    Lorenzo Bonomo
    La radiologia medica, 2015, 120 : 268 - 276
  • [3] Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Breast Lesions
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Villonio, Antonio
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Rabasco, Paola
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2015, 33 (05) : 159 - 164
  • [4] Apparent diffusion coefficient value in invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla: is it correlated with prognostic factors?
    Guvenc, Inanc
    Akay, Sinan
    Ince, Selami
    Yildiz, Ramazan
    Kilbas, Zafer
    Oysul, Fahrettin G.
    Tasar, Mustafa
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1060):
  • [5] Values of magnetic resonance imaging apparent diffusion coefficient for prognostic evaluation and pathological typing of patients with breast cancer
    Fu, Jieting
    Jiang, Qiaosheng
    Sun, Chen
    Li, Lu
    Lei, Qichao
    Tang, Guoping
    Pan, Jiangfeng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 45 (03) : 21 - 28
  • [6] Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Ng, W. K.
    Wong, C. K. K.
    Fung, E. P. Y.
    Wong, C. W.
    Mak, W. S.
    Kwok, K. M.
    Lam, H. S.
    Cho, H. Y.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [7] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Prognostic Factors
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Choi, Jae Jeong
    Jung, Ji Han
    Park, Yong Gyu
    Suh, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) : 615 - 620
  • [8] Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlation with Prognostic Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR
    Akin, Yasin
    Ugurlu, M. Umit
    Kaya, Handan
    Aribal, Erkin
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2016, 12 (03): : 123 - 132
  • [9] Can 3.0 Tesla diffusion tensor Imaging parameters be prognostic indicators in breast cancer?
    Ozal, Safiye Tokgoz
    Inci, Ercan
    Gemici, Aysegul Akdogan
    Turgut, Hurriyet
    Cikot, Murat
    Karabulut, Mehmet
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2018, 51 : 240 - 247
  • [10] 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients
    Butler, Reni S.
    Chen, Christine
    Vashi, Reena
    Hooley, Regina J.
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 5 (08): : 285 - 294