Chemotherapy is more active against proximal than distal gastric carcinoma

被引:9
作者
Higuchi, K
Koizumi, W
Tanabe, S
Saigenji, K
Ajani, JA
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, East Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2288520, Japan
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
gastric carcinoma; chemotherapy; locations; primary lesions; survival time; response rate; prognostic factor;
D O I
10.1159/000078326
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: Patients with localized proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) have a poorer outcome than those with distal gastric carcinoma (DGC) following curative resection. However, it remains uncertain whether the location of the primary tumor influences the effect of chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: We assessed 270 eligible patients with unresectable, advanced gastric carcinoma who had received first-line chemotherapy between 1989 and 2001. We defined PGC as carcinoma located in the upper one third, and DGC as carcinoma located in the lower two thirds of the stomach. Results: Of the 270 patients, 91 (33.7%) had PGC, and 179 (66.3%) had DGC. The response rate of the primary lesion was 58.6% (51/87) in the PGC group and 35.1% (59/168) in the DGC group (p < 0.01). The overall response rate for all sites was 55.6% (50/90) in the PGC group and 39.0% (69/ 177) in the DGC group ( p = 0.01). The median survival time was 318 days in the PGC group and 251 days in the DGC group ( p = 0.0336). A multivariate analysis revealed that performance status, extent of disease, and location of the primary lesion were significantly related to survival. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the response rate and survival time after first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma are better in patients with PGC than in those with DGC. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GASTRIC CANC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, GASTRIC CANCER, DOI DOI 10.1007/S101200100009]
[3]  
Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
[4]   RISING INCIDENCE OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND GASTRIC CARDIA [J].
BLOT, WJ ;
DEVESA, SS ;
KNELLER, RW ;
FRAUMENI, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (10) :1287-1289
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   Genetic differences between adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett's esophagus and gastric mucosa [J].
El-Rifai, W ;
Frierson, HF ;
Moskaluk, CA ;
Harper, JC ;
Petroni, GR ;
Bissonette, EA ;
Jones, DR ;
Knuutila, S ;
Powell, SM .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 121 (03) :592-598
[7]   Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival [J].
Green, D ;
de Leon, SP ;
Leon-Rodriguez, E ;
Sosa-Sanchez, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 25 (01) :84-89
[8]   ADENOCARCINOMAS OF ESOPHAGUS AND CARDIA IN COMPARISON WITH GASTRIC-CARCINOMA [J].
HEIDL, G ;
LANGHANS, P ;
MELLIN, W ;
BUNTE, H ;
GRUNDMANN, E .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 120 (1-2) :95-99
[9]   Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus [J].
Hulscher, JBF ;
van Sandick, JW ;
de Boer, AGEM ;
Wijnhoven, BPL ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Fockens, P ;
Stalmeier, PFM ;
ten Kate, FJW ;
van Dekken, H ;
Obertop, H ;
Tilanus, HW ;
van Lanschot, JJB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (21) :1662-1669
[10]  
Hundahl SA, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P921, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000215)88:4<921::AID-CNCR24>3.3.CO