A comparative life cycle assessment on mono- and co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge

被引:15
作者
Tong, Huanhuan [1 ]
Tong, Yen-Wah [1 ]
Peng, Ying Hong [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 4 Engn Dr 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Inst Knowledge Based Engn, 800 Dongchuan Rd, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
来源
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS | 2019年 / 158卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ORGANIC WASTE; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.814
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is common practice for Singapore wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) to treat primary sludge and secondary active sludge by anaerobic digestion (AD) to recover energy through biogas. However, sewage sludge (SS) is low in biodegradable organic matter and biomethane potential, which result in low AD efficiency both from a processing and an economic standpoint. Co-digestion of SS together with food waste (FW) not only provides a practical alternative for FW management, but also improves the performance and energy efficiency of often under-performed anaerobic digester in WWTP, as the potential synergistic effect between FW and SS could increase the biogas production and system stability. Prior to applying co-digestion in reality, life cycle assessment (LCA) is required to understand the environmental advantages and drawbacks of the co-digestion strategy so that it can be implemented more sustainability. It was found that everyday 4400 tonne of SS and 1000 t of FW were generated in Singapore. For co-digestion, the possible outcomes may be categorized as neutral, synergistic, and antagonistic, if methane production from the mixture is equivalent, higher or lower than the sum of mono-digestion. The LCA results show that when the antagonistic situation happens, the co-digestion system becomes much less favorable, although it requires less water consumption and land foot print. Therefore, the key efforts of plant manager are suggested to be spent on the maximization of biogas output. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4166 / 4171
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Anaergia, 2014, ORG DIG MSW
[2]   Need for improvements in physical pretreatment of source-separated household food waste [J].
Bernstad, A. ;
Malmquist, L. ;
Truedsson, C. ;
Jansen, J. la Cour .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (03) :746-754
[3]   Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of Viareggio and Treviso plants (Italy) [J].
Bolzonella, D. ;
Battistoni, P. ;
Susini, C. ;
Cecchi, F. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (08) :203-211
[4]   Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot- and full-scale reactors [J].
Cavinato, Cristina ;
Bolzonella, David ;
Pavan, Paolo ;
Fatone, Francesco ;
Cecchi, Franco .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 55 :260-265
[5]   Comparison study on thermal degradation behaviours and product distributions for various types of sludge by using TG-FTIR and fixed bed pyrolysis [J].
Chan, Wei Ping ;
Wang, Jing-Yuan .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2016, 121 :177-189
[6]   Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts [J].
Chiu, Sam L. H. ;
Lo, Irene M. C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (24) :24435-24450
[7]   High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in comparison with mono digestions: Stability and performance [J].
Dai, Xiaohu ;
Duan, Nina ;
Dong, Bin ;
Dai, Lingling .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (02) :308-316
[8]   Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision [J].
Edwards, Joel ;
Othman, Maazuza ;
Crossin, Enda ;
Burn, Stewart .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 223 :237-249
[9]  
Gandolfi P. B, 2012, ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
[10]   Effects of pre-treatment technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery [J].
Hansen, Trine Lund ;
Jansen, Jes la Cour ;
Davidsson, Asa ;
Christensen, Thomas Hojlund .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (03) :398-405