Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding

被引:120
作者
Hemmler, Vonna L. [1 ]
Kenney, Allison W. [2 ]
Langley, Susan Dulong [3 ]
Callahan, Carolyn M. [1 ]
Gubbins, E. Jean [4 ]
Holder, Shannon [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Educ & Human Dev, Dept Curriculum Instruct & Special Educ, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Renzulli Ctr Creat Gifted Educ & Talent Dev, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Renzulli Ctr Creat Gifted Educ & Talent Dev, Dept Educ Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Dept Educ Leadership, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
Qualitative research; qualitative coding; inter-rater reliability; consistency; consensus coding; team coding; inductive and deductive coding; INTERCODER RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PSYCHOLOGY; RIGOR;
D O I
10.1177/1468794120976072
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Though qualitative research has become more prevalent in practice over the last 30 years, there is still considerable uncertainty among researchers regarding how to ensure inter-rater consistency when teams are tasked with coding qualitative data. In this article, we offer an explanation of a methodology that our qualitative team used to achieve systematic coding of our dataset in a way that preserved the contextual, subjective nature of the data, lent itself to the deductive and inductive creation of a layered codebook, and ensured consistent application of the codebook to varied types of data. This methodology prepared us to draw logical and substantiated conclusions during subsequent analyses; hence, the process serves as a welcome addition to the literature on consistently coding qualitative data in a manner that honors its defining characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 219
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Aguinis H., 2021, Organizational Research Methods, V24, P678, DOI DOI 10.1177/1094428119836485
[2]   Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report [J].
Appelbaum, Mark ;
Cooper, Harris ;
Kline, Rex B. ;
Mayo-Wilson, Evan ;
Nezu, Arthur M. ;
Rao, Stephen M. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) :3-25
[3]   The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Gosling, A ;
Weinman, J ;
Marteau, T .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 31 (03) :597-606
[4]  
Bernard H.R., 2000, SOCIAL RES METHODS Q
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659]
[6]   From text to codings - Intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis [J].
Burla, Laila ;
Knierim, Birte ;
Barth, Juergen ;
Liewald, Katharina ;
Duetz, Margreet ;
Abel, Thomas .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 57 (02) :113-117
[7]   Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement [J].
Campbell, John L. ;
Quincy, Charles ;
Osserman, Jordan ;
Pedersen, Ove K. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2013, 42 (03) :294-320
[8]  
Carey J.W., 1996, CULTURAL ANTHR METHO, V8, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1525822X960080030101, 10.1177/1525822X960080030101]
[9]  
Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory
[10]  
Church S.P., 2019, J RURAL SOC SCI, V34, P2