Trends in Diagnostic Imaging Medicare Reimbursements: 2007 to 2019

被引:21
作者
Kumar, Soryan [1 ]
Khurana, Aditya [2 ]
Haglin, Jack M. [2 ]
Hidlay, Douglas T. [3 ]
Neville, Kevin [4 ]
Daniels, Alan H. [1 ]
Eltorai, Adam E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Lahey Clin Fdn, Burlington, MA USA
关键词
Medicare reimbursement trends; diagnostic radiology; imaging financial reimbursement;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate recent trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for various imaging studies. Methods: Common diagnostic radiologic studies were selected across multiple imaging modalities: bone densitometry, CT, CT angiography, mammography, MR angiography, MRI, nuclear medicine, radiography, and ultrasound. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from CMS was queried for Current Procedural Terminology codes to extract reimbursement data. All monetary data were adjusted for inflation to 2019 US dollars. The compound annual growth rate, average annual change, and total percentage change in reimbursement were calculated on the basis of these adjusted trends. Results: Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for all imaging modalities decreased between 2007 and 2019. The greatest mean decrease in reimbursement rates was observed for MRI (-$52.08), and the largest decrease in total percentage change was seen for bone densitometry (-70.5%). Nuclear medicine demonstrated the smallest mean decreases in both annual change (-$0.32) and total percentage change (-4.28%). Conclusions: This study examined Medicare reimbursements for radiologic studies from 2007 to 2019. After accounting for inflation, reimbursement rates were shown to decline for all studies across all imaging modalities except for individual studies in nuclear medicine, radiography, and ultrasound. Further investigation is encouraged to properly model future trends in reimbursement rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1590
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American College of Physicians, SUMM 2020 CHANG MED
[2]  
American College of Radiology, PAT PROV GROUPS TELL
[3]  
[Anonymous], PHYS FEE SCHED LOOK
[4]  
Beck DE, 2007, OCHSNER J, V7, P8
[5]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, MED COSTS GLANC
[6]  
Clemens Jeffrey, 2015, AMA J Ethics, V17, P1053, DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.11.pfor1-1511
[7]  
Coin NewsMedia Group LLC, US INFL CALC
[8]  
Diagnostic Centers of America, 2019 RAD CPT COD
[9]   CPT (R) Codes: What Are They, Why Are They Necessary, and How Are They Developed? [J].
Dotson, Peggy .
ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, 2013, 2 (10) :583-587
[10]   Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for Orthopedic Procedures: 2000 to 2016 [J].
Eltorai, Adam E. M. ;
Durand, Wesley M. ;
Haglin, Jack M. ;
Rubin, Lee E. ;
Weiss, Arnold-Peter C. ;
Daniels, Alan H. .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (02) :95-102