Willingness to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures

被引:12
作者
Borges, A. P. [1 ]
Reis, A. [2 ]
Anjos, J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lusiada Univ North, Res Ctr ISAG, European Business Sch, Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Econ, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Lusiada Univ North, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Risky behaviour; Willingness to pay; Rationing; Health care; PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY; WELLNESS INCENTIVES; RELEVANCE; SOLIDARITY; VALUATION; INSURANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2016.11.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The need to improve the sustainability of public health expenditure, in a climate of growing pressure on national budgets, inevitably leads to a discussion about resource rationing, and the extent of society's responsibility for those expenditures. To contribute to this discussion empirically, this study evaluated the willingness of Portuguese respondents to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures through out-of-pocket payments. Study design: A questionnaire addressed to the general public was developed, with 296 respondents. The survey was divided into three sections: (i) sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents; (ii) health-related habits; and (iii) willingness to pay other individuals' healthcare expenditures and, if so, how much. Methods: Logit and ordered logit models were applied. Results: Respondents were divided fairly even between those who were willing to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures and those who were not. Respondents with health insurance contracts were more willing to contribute, and the contribution value was higher. Having a degree-level education was associated with reduced willingness to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures, and reduced probability of paying a larger amount, which may be associated with holding individuals accountable for their choices. Considering self-reported risky behaviours, the respondents who consumed alcohol were more likely to be willing to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures, and to a greater extent, whereas smokers were less likely to pay larger amounts. These effects suggest that respondents with different unhealthy behaviours are not equally altruistic. Conclusions: These findings highlight the need to combine health policy and social beliefs. The respondents seem to be interested to discuss healthcare funding, given that they agreed to reveal their willingness to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures. Moreover, respondents' sociodemographic characteristics and health-related behaviours play a role in their willingness to contribute to social well-being through healthcare expenditures. The differences observed denote that no agreement exists regarding the extent of society's responsibility. (C) 2016 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 69
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Utilities versus rights to publicly provided goods: Arguments and evidence from health care rationing
    Anand, P
    Wailoo, A
    [J]. ECONOMICA, 2000, 67 (268) : 543 - 577
  • [2] The Relevance of Personal Characteristics in Health Care Rationing: What the Australian Public Thinks and Why
    Anderson, Malcolm
    Richardson, Jeff
    McKie, John
    Iezzi, Angelo
    Khan, Munir
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY, 2011, 70 (01) : 131 - 151
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Health at a Glance: Europe 2014
  • [4] Barros P., 2013, Economia da saude conceitos e comportamentos (3a)
  • [5] Barros Pedro Pita, 2011, Health Syst Transit, V13, P1
  • [6] The measurement of contingent valuation for health economics
    Bayoumi, AM
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2004, 22 (11) : 691 - 700
  • [7] Exploring the public's views on the health care system: A national survey on the issues and options
    Berk, Marc L.
    Gaylin, Daniel S.
    Schur, Claudia L.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (06) : W596 - W606
  • [8] On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors
    Bringedal, Berit
    Feiring, Eli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2011, 37 (06) : 357 - 361
  • [9] Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach
    Cappelen, AW
    Norheim, OF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (08) : 476 - 480
  • [10] Responsibility, scale and the valuation of rail safety
    Covey, Judith
    Robinson, Angela
    Jones-Lee, Michael
    Loomes, Graham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2010, 40 (01) : 85 - 108