No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty

被引:47
作者
Hollinghurst, D.
Stoney, J.
Ward, T.
Gill, H. S.
Newman, J. H.
Murray, D. W.
Beard, D. J.
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
[2] Avon Orthopaed Ctr, Senior Knee Fellow, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, OOEC, Oxford, England
关键词
kinematics; arthritis; unicompartmental; arthroplasty; fluoroscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2006.07.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The mechanisms of failure for unicompartmental arthroplasty are poorly understood. There is some suggestion that long term ligament degeneration, particularly of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), may affect long term survivorship. This study evaluated whether the cruciate mechanism remained functional in the long term (10 years) following UKA. Two separate cohorts of patients who bad undergone St Georg Sled medial compartmental arthroplasty had knee kinematics assessed using an established fluoroscopic technique. One group (early) was assessed at a mean of 46 months (3.8 years) since surgery, whilst the other (late) was assessed at a mean of 125 months (10.4) following surgery. No significant difference was found in the sagittal plane kinematics between the two groups or in comparison to the control normal knee. The results suggest that after fixed bearing UKA the cruciate mechanism remains intact over time and the ligaments continue to function similarly to those of the normal knee. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 444
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ALTMAN D, 1986, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]   A VIDEOFLUOROSCOPY METHOD FOR OPTICAL DISTORTION CORRECTION AND MEASUREMENT OF KNEE-JOINT KINEMATICS [J].
BALTZOPOULOS, V .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (02) :85-92
[3]   In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties [J].
Banks, SA ;
Markovich, GD ;
Hodge, WA .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (03) :297-304
[4]  
BEARD DJ, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V372, P205
[5]   Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee - Clinical and technical considerations [J].
Chakrabarty, G ;
Newman, JH ;
Ackroyd, CE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (02) :191-196
[6]   Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Murray, D ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1998, 80B (01) :63-69
[7]   In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement [J].
Dennis, D ;
Komistek, R ;
Scuderi, G ;
Argenson, JN ;
Insall, J ;
Mahfouz, M ;
Aubaniac, JM ;
Haas, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A :104-115
[8]  
DESAI V, 2002, COMB ORTH KNEE SOC M, P85
[9]   Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J].
Hernigou, P ;
Deschamps, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (03) :506-511
[10]   Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI [J].
Hill, PF ;
Vedi, V ;
Williams, A ;
Iwaki, H ;
Pinskerova, V ;
Freeman, MAR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (08) :1196-1198