Combined Utility of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Prostate Biopsy Pathology

被引:21
作者
Kalapara, Arveen A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ballok, Zita E. [4 ]
Ramdave, Shakher [5 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [4 ]
Ryan, Andrew [6 ]
Konety, Badrinath [3 ]
Grummet, Jeremy P. [1 ,2 ]
Frydenberg, Mark [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Australian Urol Associates, Malvern, Australia
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Healthcare Imaging Serv, Richmond, Australia
[5] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med & Pet, Bentleigh East, Australia
[6] TissuPath, Mt Waverley, Vic, Australia
[7] Cabrini Hlth, Cabrini Inst, Malvern, Australia
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Positron emission tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; GA-68-PSMA-11; PET/CT; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PSMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: (68)Gallium-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET) is a valuable staging tool, but its utility in characterising primary prostate cancer remains unclear. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) is a quantification measure of highest radiotracer uptake within PET-avid lesions. Objective: To assess the utility of SUVmax in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy alone and in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective analysis of 200 men who underwent Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and transperineal template prostate biopsy between 2016 and 2018. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of grade group (GG) 3-5 and GG 2-5 prostate cancer, respectively. We used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare SUVmax by GG, and calculated sensitivity and specificity for csPCa detection via Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and both. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of csPCa on biopsy. Results and limitations: The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3-5 tumours (6.40, interquartile range [IQR] 4.47-11.0) than for benign and GG 1-2 tumours (3.14, IQR 2.55-3.91; p < 0.001). The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3 (5.70, IQR 3.68-8.67) than for GG 2 (3.47, IQR 2.70-4.74; p < 0.001). For GG 3-5 disease, sensitivity was 86.5%, 95.9%, and 98.6%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.4%, 88.5%, and 93.3% using SUVmax >= 4, a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3-5, and both, respectively. This combined model detected more GG 3-5 disease than mpMRI alone (98.6% vs 95.9%; p = 0.04). SUVmax was an independent predictor of csPCa for GG 3-5 disease only (odds ratio 1.27 per unit, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45). Our results are limited by the retrospective study design. Conclusions: Greater SUVmax on Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT is associated with detection of GG 3-5 cancer on biopsy. The combination of PI-RADS score and SUVmax provides higher sensitivity and NPV than either alone. Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT may be useful alongside mpMRI in improving risk stratification for localised disease. Patient summary: The amount of a radioactive tracer taken up in the prostate during a type of scan called PET (positron emission tomography) can predict whether aggressive prostate cancer is likely to be found on biopsy. This may complement the more usual type of scan, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), used to detect prostate cancer. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 320
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Initial Experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Budaeus, Lars
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Salomon, Georg
    Michl, Uwe
    Heinzer, Hans
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Steuber, Thomas
    Rosenbaum, Clemens
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 393 - 396
  • [3] Simultaneous 68Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI Improves the Localization of Primary Prostate Cancer
    Eiber, Matthias
    Weirich, Gregor
    Holzapfel, Konstantin
    Souvatzoglou, Michael
    Haller, Bernhard
    Rauscher, Isabel
    Beer, Ambros J.
    Wester, Hans-Juergen
    Gschwend, Juergen
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Maurer, Tobias
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (05) : 829 - 836
  • [4] 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Detects the Location and Extent of Primary Prostate Cancer
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Schmidt, Dorothea F.
    Wenter, Vera
    Thierfelder, Kolja M.
    Zach, Christian
    Stief, Christian
    Bartenstein, Peter
    Kirchner, Thomas
    Gildehaus, Franz J.
    Gratzke, Christian
    Faber, Claudius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (11) : 1720 - 1725
  • [5] Fitzmaurice C, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P524, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706]
  • [6] Prospective Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Detection of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Comparison With mpMRI
    Gaur, Sonia
    Mena, Esther
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Lindenberg, Maria L.
    Adler, Stephen
    Ton, Anita T.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Mease, Ronnie C.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (03) : 652 - 659
  • [7] Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Hicks, Robert M.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Zhang, Li
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 730 - 737
  • [8] Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using 68gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy specimen pathology
    Kalapara, Arveen A.
    Nzenza, Tatenda
    Pan, Henry Y. C.
    Ballok, Zita
    Ramdave, Shakher
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Ryan, Andrew
    Cherk, Martin
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Bolton, Damien
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Grummet, Jeremy P.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (01) : 83 - 90
  • [9] 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Newly Diagnosed Carcinoma of the Prostate: Correlation of Intraprostatic PSMA Uptake with Several Clinical Parameters
    Koerber, Stefan A.
    Utzinger, Maximilian T.
    Kratochwil, Clemens
    Kesch, Claudia
    Haefner, Matthias F.
    Katayama, Sonja
    Mier, Walter
    Iagaru, Andrei H.
    Herfarth, Klaus
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Debus, Juergen
    Giesel, Frederik L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (12) : 1943 - 1948
  • [10] 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men with Contraindications to or Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Observational Study
    Lopci, Egesta
    Saita, Alberto
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Colombo, Piergiuseppe
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Hurle, Rodolfo
    Marzo, Katia
    Peschechera, Roberto
    Benetti, Alessio
    Zandegiacomo, Silvia
    Pasini, Luisa
    Lista, Giuliana
    Cardone, Pasquale
    Castello, Angelo
    Maffei, Davide
    Balzarini, Luca
    Chiti, Arturo
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Casale, Paolo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (01) : 95 - 103