Durability of abdominal aortic endograft with the Talent Unidoc stent graft in common practice: Core lab reanalysis from the TAURIS multicenter study

被引:22
作者
Cao, Piergiorgio [1 ]
De Rango, Paola [1 ]
Parlani, Gianbattista [1 ]
Verzini, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Unit Vasc & Endovasc Surg, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
关键词
ANEURYSM-REPAIR; ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR; SECONDARY INTERVENTIONS; NECK DILATION; DEVICE MIGRATION; OUTCOMES; EVAR; ENDOLEAK; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.044
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objective: Durability is the main concern of aortic endografting, but it is not clear to what extent trial results are applicable to "real world" patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the durability of a single model of aortic endograft in an unselected population with core lab analysis of morphological changes. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) images of patients treated with Talent Unidoc (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) endografts from 2002 to 2006 in nine European centers with more than 1 year follow-up were centrally reviewed using a dedicated software with multiplanar and volume reconstructions. Images were checked for aneurysm growth >= 5 mm, neck enlargement >3 mm, graft migration >= 10 mm, endoleak, structural integrity. Morphological changes were defined clinically relevant when associated with reintervention or aneurysm-related death. Results: A total of 349 patients (mean age 73.8 years, 90% males) were available for analysis; 1187 CT examinations were reviewed. Median abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter was 56 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 49-62), neck length 20 mm (IQR 16-30), and neck diameter 25 mm (IQR 23-26). Mean follow-tip was 25 months (range 12-60 months). During the study period, 10 late deaths (1 aneurysm-related, 0.3%) with a survival rate of 89.2% at 48 months and 33 reinterventions including 8 conversions (2.2%), 2 AAA ruptures (0.6%) and 1 (0.3%) loss of graft integrity were recorded. Cumulative reintervention rate was 6%, 8%, 13%, and 16% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. According to core lab analysis, 22 AAA grew, 169 were unchanged, and 158 shrunk, with a growing AAA rate of 3.1% patients/year. Five growths, required reintervention, one for rupture. Forty-seven (6.5% patients/year) neck enlargements, three clinically relevant, 17 migrations (2.4% patients/year), five clinically relevant, and 70 endoleaks (9.7% patients/year), 11 clinically relevant, were detected. Conclusion: Data from this real world experience monitored with a centralized imaging review show that endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with the latest generation of a single model of endograft is associated with low graft thrombosis and graft fatigue, and low late aneurysm rupture and related death risks. Neck enlargement although common after EVAR, is almost always without clinical consequences but a longer follow-up and prospective clinical studies are advisable to confirm the present results. (J Vasc Surg 2009;49:859-65.)
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 865
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): An anatomic and device-specific analysis [J].
Abbruzzese, Thomas A. ;
Kwolck, Christopher J. ;
Brewster, David C. ;
Chung, Thomas K. ;
Kang, Jeanwan ;
Conrad, Mark F. ;
LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ;
Cambria, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (01) :19-28
[2]  
Badger SA, 2008, VASC ENDOVASC SURG, V41, P500
[3]   Outcomes of secondary interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair [J].
Becquemin, JP ;
Kelley, L ;
Zubilewicz, T ;
Desgranges, P ;
Lapeyre, M ;
Kobeiter, H .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (02) :298-304
[4]   Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Blankensteijn, JD ;
de Jong, SECA ;
Prinssen, M ;
van der Ham, AC ;
Buth, J ;
van Sterkenburg, SMM ;
Verhagen, HJM ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2398-2405
[5]   Clinical effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm endografting: 7-year concurrent comparison with open repair [J].
Cao, P ;
Verzini, F ;
Parlani, G ;
Romano, L ;
De Rango, P ;
Pagliuca, V ;
Iacono, G .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 40 (05) :841-848
[6]   Device migration after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Analysis of 113 cases with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years [J].
Cao, P ;
Verzini, F ;
Zannetti, S ;
De Rango, P ;
Parlani, G ;
Lupattelli, L ;
Maselli, A .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (02) :229-235
[7]   Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts [J].
Cao, P ;
Verzini, F ;
Parlani, G ;
De Rango, P ;
Parente, B ;
Giordano, G ;
Mosca, S ;
Maselli, A .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (06) :1200-1205
[8]   Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Harris, PL ;
White, GH ;
Zarins, CK ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Matsumura, JS ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Rutherford, RB ;
Kent, KC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1048-1060
[9]  
DONAYRE CE, 2008, ENDOVASC TODAY S, P11
[10]   Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Epstein, D ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Sculpher, MJ ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478) :2179-2186