Risk-controlled economic performance of compressed air energy storage and wind generation in day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets

被引:10
作者
Sriyakul, Thanaporn [1 ]
Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mahanakorn Univ Technol, Fac Business Adm, Bangkok 10530, Thailand
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Henan Univ Econ & Law, MBA Sch, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
Commercial compressed air energy storage (CCAES); Wind generation; Power aggregator (PA); Downside risk constraints approach (DRCA); Day-ahead (DA) and intraday (IN) and balancing (BL) markets; DEMAND RESPONSE; BIDDING STRATEGY; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION; CAES;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper, the wind power aggregator is cooperating with a commercial compressed air energy storage (CCAES) to participate in three markets, including day-ahead (DA), intraday (IN), and balancing (BL) markets. A three-stage stochastic programming problem is formulated to model the optimal operation of the proposed system. In the proposed model, the uncertainties of wind power, as well as DA, IN, and BL markets price is modeled by the implementation of scenario generation and reduction methods. Financial risks imposed from the uncertain parameters are investigated in the proposed stochastic optimization framework. For this purpose, the downside risk constraints approach (DRCA) is modeled in the stochastic formulation to manage the financial risks. In the proposed DRCA, a risk-based strategy can be proposed for the aggregation of CCAES and wind as a power aggregator (PA) that has a controlled risk in the risk-averse strategy. According to obtained results, the expected profit of PA without DRCA is (sic) 4176.3, while the proposed strategy by the DRCA leads to a (sic) 4094.0 profit. Therefore the proposed strategy by DRCA has a lower profit (1.97%) while leads to a guaranteed risk-controlled strategy for PA with the reduced risk by 100%. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 193
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Co-optimized trading of wind-thermal-pumped storage system in energy and regulation markets [J].
Al-Swaiti, Mustafa S. ;
Al-Awami, Ali T. ;
Khalid, Mohammad Waqas .
ENERGY, 2017, 138 :991-1005
[2]   Risk-Constrained Optimal Bidding Strategy for Pairing of Wind and Demand Response Resources [J].
Asensio, Miguel ;
Contreras, Javier .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2017, 8 (01) :200-208
[3]   Risk-Oriented Multi-Area Economic Dispatch Solution With High Penetration of Wind Power Generation and Compressed Air Energy Storage System [J].
Azizivahed, Ali ;
Razavi, Seyed-Ehsan ;
Arefi, Ali ;
Ghadi, Mojtaba Jabbari ;
Li, Li ;
Zhang, Jiangfeng ;
Shafie-khan, Miadreza ;
Catalao, Joao P. S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 11 (03) :1569-1578
[4]   Offering Strategy of Wind-Power Producer: A Multi-Stage Risk-Constrained Approach [J].
Baringo, Luis ;
Conejo, Antonio J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2016, 31 (02) :1420-1429
[5]   Strategic Offering for a Wind Power Producer [J].
Baringo, Luis ;
Conejo, Antonio J. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) :4645-4654
[6]  
Barroso L.A., 2006, DECISION MAKING UNCE, V153
[7]   Reliability and economic assessment of compressed air energy storage in transmission constrained wind integrated power system [J].
Bhattara, Safal ;
Kark, Rajesh ;
Piya, Prasanna .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2019, 25
[8]   Value of bulk energy storage for managing wind power fluctuations [J].
Black, Mary ;
Strbac, Goran .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2007, 22 (01) :197-205
[9]   Energy storage requirements to address wind energy variability [J].
Boretti, Alberto .
ENERGY STORAGE, 2019, 1 (05)
[10]   Optimal bidding and offering strategies of compressed air energy storage: A hybrid robust-stochastic approach [J].
Cai, Wei ;
Mohammaditab, Rasoul ;
Fathi, Gholamreza ;
Wakil, Karzan ;
Ebadi, Abdol Ghaffar ;
Ghadimi, Noradin .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 :1-8