Validating a newly proposed classification system for thoracolumbar spine trauma: Looking to the future of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score

被引:39
作者
Bono, Christopher M.
Vaccaro, Alexander R.
Hurlbert, R. J.
Arnold, Paul
Oner, F. C.
Harrop, James
Anand, Neel
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[5] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Cedars Sinai Inst Spinal Disorders, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
thoracolumbar; fracture; injury; classification; validation;
D O I
10.1097/01.bot.0000244999.90868.52
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although numerous systems have been proposed, there is no universally accepted classification or scoring system for thoracolumbar spine injuries. Some have gained popularity, but most systems have never been modified or advanced beyond their initial introductory state. To the authors' knowledge, no thoracolumbar classification system has ever been validated in a systematic and scientific manner. Study Purpose: To critically review previous thoracolumbar classification systems, to discuss the proposal of the new Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS), to review the steps taken thus far in assessing the reliability of this system, and to discuss plans for future clinical validation of TLICS. Methods: The authors performed a comprehensive search and analysis of previously published systems for classifying or scoring thoracolumbar spine injuries. Based on the merits and faults of these systems, among other factors, they have developed TLICS. Conclusions: Of the three phases of validating a fracture classification system described by Audige et al, TLICS has successfully passed through phase I (development) and phase 2 (multicenter agreement studies). With modifications made in response to phase 2 studies, TLICS will be ready to enter into the clinical validation phase. Although TLICS will initially be assessed for its ability to predict type of treatment, it is the authors' hope that, with appropriate analysis, the system will also be predictive of injury severity and clinical outcomes. These qualities remain to be demonstrated through rigorous prospective clinical investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 572
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aligizakis A, 2002, Acta Orthop Belg, V68, P279
[2]   Gertzbein and load sharing classifications for unstable thoracolumbar fractures [J].
Aligizakis, AC ;
Katonis, PG ;
Sapkas, G ;
Papagelopoulos, PJ ;
Galanakis, I ;
Hadjipavlou, A .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (411) :77-85
[3]  
Audigé L, 2005, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V19, P401
[4]  
Bohler L., 1956, TREATMENT FRACTURES, V5th, P300
[5]   Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rule in children: A multicenter study [J].
Bulloch, B ;
Neto, G ;
Plint, A ;
Lim, R ;
Lidman, P ;
Reed, M ;
Nijssen-Jordan, C ;
Tenenbein, M ;
Klassen, TP .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (01) :48-55
[6]  
Caviglia HA, 2002, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P17
[7]   The multi-institutional validation of the new screening index for physical child abuse [J].
Chang, DC ;
Knight, VM ;
Ziegfeld, S ;
Haider, A ;
Paidas, C .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2005, 40 (01) :114-119
[8]   Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures [J].
Dai, LY ;
Jin, WJ .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (03) :354-358
[9]  
DAVAN PS, 2004, ACAD EMERG MED, V11, P736