Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: A comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone

被引:148
|
作者
Fox, MW
Onofrio, BM
Hanssen, AD
机构
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO GRAD SCH MED, DEPT NEUROSURG, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 USA
[2] MAYO CLIN & MAYO GRAD SCH MED, DEPT ORTHOPED, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 USA
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis outcome; spinal fusion; laminectomy; spinal instability;
D O I
10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0793
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
One hundred twenty-four patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis underwent decompression with fusion (32 patients) and without fusion (92 patients) during a 30-month period between 1986 and 1988. Patient-reported satisfaction at a mean follow-up period of 5.8 years (range 4.6-6.8 years) revealed a 79% good or fair outcome and a 21% poor outcome (26 patients). Seven patients (6%) developed lumbar instability, three patients (2%) developed new stenosis at an adjacent unoperated level, and three patients (2%) developed a new disc herniation between 2 and 5 years after surgery. Progressive postoperative spondylolisthesis occurred in 31% of patients with normal preoperative alignment (mean 7.8 mm, range 2-20 mm) and in 73% of patients with preoperative subluxation (mean 5.1 mm, range 2-13 mm) in whom fusion was nor attained. Radiological progression did not correlate well with patient-reported outcome. The major conclusions from this study are the following: 1) the majority of patients respond well to this surgery, but complication (22%) and late deterioration (10%) rates are not insignificant; 2) radiological instability is common after decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, but this correlates poorly with clinical outcome; 3) there are no definitive clinical or radiological factors that preoperatively predict patients at risk for a poor outcome; 4) postoperative radiological instability is more Likely to occur when the following criteria are present: preoperative spondylolisthesis, abnormal motion detected on preoperative dynamic imaging, decompression occuring across a minimally degenerated L-4 or a markedly degenerated L-3 disc; and when a radical and extensive decompression greater than one level is planned; and 5) the group at greatest risk for a poor outcome consists of those patients with normal preoperative alignment who do not suffer slippage following surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 802
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Decompressive Laminectomy Alone for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Spinal Stenosis: Incidence of Post-Laminectomy Instability in the Elderly
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Seo, Jeung-Hwan
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (04) : 493 - 502
  • [2] Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Gelalis, Ioannis D.
    Arnaoutoglou, Christina
    Christoforou, Giorgos
    Lykissas, Marios G.
    Batsilas, Ioannis
    Xenakis, Theodoros
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2010, 44 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [3] Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminectomy by transspinous approach for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Ucer, Melih
    Aydin, Ilhan
    Tacyildiz, Abdullah Emre
    Dogan, Ihsan
    Emel, Erhan
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (11) : 1618 - 1624
  • [4] Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented of noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes
    Katz, JN
    Lipson, SJ
    Lew, RA
    Grobler, LJ
    Weinstein, JN
    Brick, GW
    Fossel, AH
    Liang, MH
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (10) : 1123 - 1131
  • [5] Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy
    Mobbs, Ralph Jasper
    Li, Jane
    Sivabalan, Praveenan
    Raley, Darryl
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [6] Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Pao, Jwo-Luen
    Chen, Wein-Chin
    Chen, Po-Quang
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (05) : 672 - 678
  • [7] Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lauryssen, Carl
    Jackson, Robert J.
    Baron, Jeffrey M.
    Tallarico, Richard A.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Deutsch, Harel
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 763 - 769
  • [8] A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Decompression Alone and Fusion in Elderly Patients with Two-Level or More Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Son, Seong
    Kim, Woo Kyung
    Lee, Sang Gu
    Park, Chan Woo
    Lee, Keun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 53 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [9] The effect of limited interlaminar decompression versus complete laminectomy on intrathecal volume in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Krämer, R
    Wild, A
    Haak, H
    Borowski, S
    Krauspe, R
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2002, 47 (06): : 159 - 163
  • [10] Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gadjradj, Pravesh Shankar
    Basilious, Mark
    Goldberg, Jacob L. L.
    Sommer, Fabian
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Mykolajtchuk, Catherine
    Ng, Amanda Z. Z.
    Medary, Branden
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Haertl, Roger
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (03) : 1054 - 1067