On the impact of different voltage unbalance metrics in distribution system optimization

被引:41
作者
Girigoudar, Kshitij [1 ]
Roald, Line A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Elect & Comp Engn Dept, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Voltage unbalance; Three-phase AC optimal power flow; Solar PV inverters;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106656
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With increasing penetrations of single-phase, rooftop solar PV installations, the relative variations in per-phase loading and associated voltage unbalance are expected to increase. High voltage unbalance may increase network losses and lead to failure of three-phase equipment such as motor loads. However, solar PV panels are connected to the grid through inverters, which can provide reactive power support and may mitigate some of these negative effects. In this paper, we utilize a three-phase AC optimal power flow (OPF) formulation to minimize voltage unbalance using reactive power from solar PV inverters. When considering actions to reduce voltage unbalance, it is important to recognize that various organizations such as IEC, NEMA and IEEE provide different and partially inconsistent definitions of voltage unbalance in their power quality standards. This paper analyzes the impact of the different voltage unbalance metrics using different combinations of voltage unbalance objectives and constraints. For our analysis, the optimization scheme is tested on two unbalanced low-voltage distribution networks. We observe that minimizing voltage unbalance defined by one standard might actually increase voltage unbalance as defined by another standard, potentially resulting in equipment damage. We also observe that minimizing voltage unbalance does not always lead to lower network losses. However, considerable reduction in voltage unbalance with low network losses can be achieved by minimizing the losses while simultaneously enforcing limits on multiple definitions of voltage unbalance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, IEC 61000-2-2
  • [2] [Anonymous], MG11993 ANSI NEMA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, C8411995 ANSI
  • [4] ARRILLAGA J., 1983, COMPUTER MODELLING E
  • [5] Bajo CG, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), P2875, DOI 10.1109/ICIT.2015.7125522
  • [6] Comprehensive Modeling of Three-Phase Distribution Systems via the Bus Admittance Matrix
    Bazrafshan, Mohammadhafez
    Gatsis, Nikolaos
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (02) : 2015 - 2029
  • [7] Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing
    Bezanson, Jeff
    Edelman, Alan
    Karpinski, Stefan
    Shah, Viral B.
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 2017, 59 (01) : 65 - 98
  • [8] Deaver B.J., 2010, US Patent, Patent No. 7804280
  • [9] JuMP: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Optimization
    Dunning, Iain
    Huchette, Joey
    Lubin, Miles
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 2017, 59 (02) : 295 - 320
  • [10] Girigoudar K., 2019, NORTH AMER POW SYMP