共 50 条
Development of a new diabetes risk prediction tool for incident coronary heart disease events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study
被引:52
作者:
Yeboah, Joseph
[1
]
Erbel, Raimund
[2
]
Delaney, Joseph Chris
[3
]
Nance, Robin
[3
]
Guo, Mengye
[3
]
Bertoni, Alain G.
[4
]
Budoff, Matthew
[5
]
Moebus, Susanne
[6
]
Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
[6
]
Burke, Gregory L.
[4
]
Wong, Nathan D.
[7
]
Lehmann, Nils
Herrington, David M.
[1
]
Moehlenkamp, Stefan
[8
]
Greenland, Philip
[9
]
机构:
[1] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, West German Heart Ctr Essen, Dept Cardiol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[5] Los Angeles Biomed Res Ctr, Torrance, CA USA
[6] Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Essen, Germany
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Cardiol, Heart Dis Prevent Program, Irvine, CA USA
[8] Bethanien Hosp Moers, Clin Cardiol, Moers, Germany
[9] Northwestern Univ Feinberg, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
关键词:
Diabetes mellitus;
Coronary calcium score;
Risk assessment;
Coronary heart disease;
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE;
FRAMINGHAM;
MODEL;
QUANTIFICATION;
VALIDATION;
ENGINE;
MESA;
STRATIFICATION;
IMPROVEMENT;
EQUATIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.035
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective: We develop a new diabetes CHD risk estimator using traditional risk factors plus coronary artery calcium (CAC), ankle-brachial index (ABI), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, family history of CHD, and carotid intima-media thickness and compared it with United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes study (UKPDS), Framingham risk and the NCEP/ATP III risk scores in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods and Results: We combined data from T2DM without clinical CVD in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (N = 1343). After a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 85 (6.3%) participants had incident CHD. Among the novel risk markers, CAC best predicted CHD independent of the FRS [hazard ratio: HR (95% CI): log (CAC +25):1.69 (1.45-1.97), p < 0.0001; CAC categories: CAC <= 25 as reference, >25 and <= 125:2.29 (0.87-5.95), >125 and <= 400: 3.87 (1.57-9.57), >400: 5.97 (2.57-13.84), respectively). The MESA-HNR diabetes CHD risk score has better accuracy for the main outcome versus the FRS or UKPDS [area under curve (AUC) of 0.76 vs. 0.70 and 0.69, respectively; all p < 0.05]. The MESA-HNR risk score improved risk classification versus the FRS (net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 0.19 and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) = 0.046, p < 0.05) and UKPDS (NRI = 0.215 and IDI = 0.046, p < 0.05). Compared with the ATP III guidelines, the MESA-HNR score has an NRI of 0.74 for the main outcome. Conclusions: This new CHD risk estimator has better discriminative ability for incident CHD than the FRS, UKPDS, and the ATP III/NCEP recommendations in a multi-ethnic cohort with T2DM. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 417
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条