An innovative adaptive sparse response surface method for structural reliability analysis

被引:70
作者
Guimaraes, Hugo [1 ]
Matos, Jose C. [1 ]
Henriques, Antonio A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, CONSTRUCT, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Structural reliability; Response surface; Metamodel; Small failure probability; Confidence interval; SMALL FAILURE PROBABILITIES; STOCHASTIC FINITE-ELEMENT; NEURAL-NETWORK; WEIGHTED REGRESSION; SIMULATION METHOD; HIGH DIMENSIONS; DESIGN; ALGORITHMS; CONFIDENCE; INTERVALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.02.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the scope of infrastructure risk assessment, structural reliability analysis leads to a challenging problem in order to deal with conflicting objectives: accurate estimation of failure probabilities and computational efficiency. Since the application of classical reliability methods is limited and often leads to a prohibitive computational cost, metamodeling techniques (e.g. polynomial chaos, kriging, response surface methods (RSM), etc.) have been widely used. Nevertheless, existing RSM present limitations handling with highly non-linear limit states, large-scale problems and approximation error. To overcome these problems, this paper describes a cutting-edge response surface algorithm covering the following issues: (i) dimensionality reduction by a variable screening procedure; (ii) definition of a promising search domain; (iii) initial experimental design based on an optimized space-filling scheme; (iv) model selection according to a stepwise regression procedure; (v) model validation by a cross-validation approach; (vi) model fitting using a double weighted regression technique; (vii) sequential sampling scheme by exploring a defined region of interest; (viii) confidence interval of reliability estimates based on a bootstrapping technique. With the aim of proving its efficiency, a wide collection of six illustration examples, concerning both analytical and FE-based problems, was selected. By benchmarking obtained results with literature findings, proposed method not only outperforms existing RSM, but also provides a powerful alternative to the use of other metamodeling techniques. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 28
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   An improvement of the response surface method [J].
Allaix, D. L. ;
Carbone, V. I. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) :165-172
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 10 INT C STRUCT SA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DESIGN ANAL COMPUTER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, DOI DOI 10.1016/0266-8920(86)90033-0
[5]  
[Anonymous], 18 C FRANC MEC GREN
[6]  
[Anonymous], S MULTIANAL OPTIM
[7]   Application of subset simulation methods to reliability benchmark problems [J].
Au, S. K. ;
Ching, J. ;
Beck, J. L. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2007, 29 (03) :183-193
[8]   Important sampling in high dimensions [J].
Au, SK ;
Beck, JL .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2003, 25 (02) :139-163
[9]   Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation [J].
Au, SK ;
Beck, JL .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2001, 16 (04) :263-277
[10]   Constructing space-filling designs using an adaptive WSP algorithm for spaces with constraints [J].
Beal, A. ;
Claeys-Bruno, M. ;
Sergent, M. .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2014, 133 :84-91