Evaluation of environmental sustainability of milk goat production with LCA approach

被引:0
作者
Celozzi, Stefania [1 ]
Mattiello, Silvana [1 ]
Battini, Monica [1 ]
Bailo, Giovanni [1 ]
Bava, Luciana [1 ]
Tamburini, Alberto [1 ]
Valsecchi, Irene [1 ]
Zucali, Maddalena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Agr & Ambientali Prod Terr Agroe, Via Giovanni Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
来源
LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW | 2020年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Environmental impact; Dairy goat production; Life Cycle Assessment; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CARBON FOOTPRINT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions of dairy goat breeding has a limited weight in respect to the whole livestock sector, it is yet paramount to reduce the carbon footprint in order to limit the impact on climate change. The objective of this study was to quantify the environmental impact of milk production in 8 dairy goat farms in Lombardy region (Northern Italy) by using a Life Cycle Assessment approach; the focus was set on critical points of the production process. Environmental impact results were very variable, ranging from 1.12 to 3.05 kg CO2 eq/kg fat and protein corrected milk. Farms with a different milk production level (946 and 1260 kg per goat/year) showed similar levels of kg CO2 eq emitted (1.46 vs 1.48). This suggests that the intensification of milk production alone is not enough to make the goat milk production system more efficient: in fact, appropriate feeding strategies, in particular the increase of feed self-sufficiency and a rational management of livestock effluents, can also help to reduce the emission load of goat milk production. Our study confirms that enteric methane emissions and purchased feed are the main drivers of environmental impact of goat milk production, although with a different weight of these hotspots, according to the production context. During goat cheese production, only 10% of greenhouse gas emissions depend on cheese making process per se, whereas the major impact (90%) is due to goat milk production. Farms that are characterized by extensive systems had worse environmental results expressed by kg fat and protein corrected milk; when 1 ha of usable agricultural area is considered as functional unit, these farms obtain better environmental results, because their impact is diluted on a higher soil availability. This study has highlighted that, although there are processes such as enteric methane emission in which the intervention of farmer is limited, there are management strategies that can contribute to reduce the environmental impact of goat milk production.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, IDF B
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IPPC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, P4
[3]   Impact assessment of traditional food manufacturing: The case of Grana Padano cheese [J].
Bava, L. ;
Bacenetti, J. ;
Gislon, G. ;
Pellegrino, L. ;
D'Incecco, P. ;
Sandrucci, A. ;
Tamburini, A. ;
Fiala, M. ;
Zucali, M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 626 :1200-1209
[4]   Improving production efficiency as a strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions on pastoral dairy farms in New Zealand [J].
Beukes, P. C. ;
Gregorini, P. ;
Romera, A. J. ;
Levy, G. ;
Waghorn, G. C. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 136 (3-4) :358-365
[5]   Carbon footprint of dairy goat production systems: A comparison of three contrasting grazing levels in the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park (Southern Spain) [J].
Gutierrez-Pena, Rosario ;
Mena, Yolanda ;
Batalla, Inmaculada ;
Manuel Mancilla-Leyton, Juan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 232 :993-998
[6]  
Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), 2018, AL RUM
[7]  
International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD), 2011, 24571 EUR EN PUBL OF
[8]  
Loszach S., 2008, QUADERNO SOZOOALP, V5, P279
[9]   Climate change: Production performance, health issues, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies in sheep and goat farming [J].
Marino, R. ;
Atzori, A. S. ;
D'Andrea, M. ;
Iovane, G. ;
Trabalza-Marinucci, M. ;
Rinaldi, L. .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2016, 135 :50-59
[10]   Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review [J].
McClellande, S. C. ;
Arndt, C. ;
Gordon, D. R. ;
Thoma, G. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2018, 209 :39-45