Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU

被引:12
作者
Schoenefeld, Jonas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Polit Sci, Dolivostr 15, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Norwich, England
来源
VOLUNTAS | 2021年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Interest group; NGO; Civil society organisation; Lobbying; Framing; EU; DEMOCRACY; PROFESSIONALIZATION; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1007/s11266-020-00283-w
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Scholars have used varying terminology for describing non-state entities seeking to influence public policy or work with the EU's institutions. This paper argues that the use of this terminology is not and should not be random, as different 'frames' come with different normative visions about the role(s) of these entities in EU democracy. A novel bibliometric analysis of 780 academic publications between 1992 and 2020 reveals that three frames stand out: The interest group frame, the NGO frame, as well as the civil society organisation frame; a number of publications also use multiple frames. This article reveals the specific democratic visions contained in these frames, including a pluralist view for interest groups; a governance view for NGOs as 'third sector' organisations, and participatory and deliberative democracy contributions for civil society organisations. The use of these frames has dynamically changed over time, with 'interest groups' on the rise. The results demonstrate the shifting focus of studies on non-state actors in the EU and consolidation within the sub-field; the original visions of European policy-makers emerging from the 2001 White Paper on governance may only partially come true.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 596
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Police, non-state actors, and political legitimacy in Central America [J].
Cruz, Jose Miguel .
POLICING & SOCIETY, 2022, 32 (03) :291-310
[22]   Determinants of successful delivery by non-state actors: an exploratory study [J].
Puig, Daniel ;
Bakhtiari, Fatemeh .
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 21 (01) :93-111
[23]   Democracy at Stake: Multipositional Actors and Politicization in the EU Civil Society Field [J].
Oleart, Alvaro ;
Bouza, Luis .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2018, 56 (04) :870-887
[24]   Dynamics of Legitimation in Regional Organisations: The OAS and Non State Actors [J].
Mace, Gordon .
GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2020, 34 (04) :507-527
[25]   CIVIL SOCIETY ACTORS AND THE WELFARE STATE A historically-based analytical framework [J].
Busso, Sandro ;
De Luigi, Nicola .
PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO, 2019, 12 (02) :259-296
[26]   Governance in the Sahel by armed non-state actors: a theoretical and applied model [J].
Olmedo, Concepcion Anguita .
REVISTA CIENTIFICA GENERAL JOSE MARIA CORDOVA, 2024, 21 (43) :601-628
[27]   Enforcement of Multilateral Trade Regulation by Non-State Actors - Desirable and Feasible? [J].
Alexovicova, Iveta .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2024, 15 (03) :497-512
[28]   Disasters and non-state actors - human rights-based approaches [J].
Hesselman, Marlies ;
Lane, Lottie .
DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (05) :526-539
[29]   Enrolling Non-State Actors to Improve Compliance with Minimum Employment Standards [J].
Hardy, Tess .
ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2011, 22 (03) :117-140
[30]   Revitalizing REDD plus Policy Processes in Vietnam: The Roles of State and Non-State Actors [J].
Thu Ba Huynh ;
Keenan, Rodney J. .
FORESTS, 2017, 8 (03)