Dynamic antimullerian hormone levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation predict in vitro fertilization response and pregnancy outcomes

被引:11
作者
Styer, Aaron K. [1 ,2 ]
Gaskins, Audrey J. [3 ]
Brady, Paula C. [1 ,2 ]
Sluss, Patrick M. [4 ]
Chavarro, Jorge E. [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Hauser, Russ B. [1 ,2 ,5 ,8 ]
Toth, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Vincent Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Vincent Reprod Med & IVF, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Nutr, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Dept Epidemiol, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Channing Div Network Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Univ, Dept Environm Hlth, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Antimullerian hormone; assisted reproductive technology; controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; in vitro fertilization; ANTI-MULLERIAN-HORMONE; INHIBIN-B; LIVE-BIRTH; ASSISTED CONCEPTION; CYCLES; ASSAYS; FSH; STIMULATION; ASSOCIATION; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1161
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the patterns of change in serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and their relation to concurrent response and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): A total of 113 consecutive fresh IVF embryo transfer cycles from September 1, 2012 through January 1, 2013. Intervention(s): Serial serum AMH measurements were analyzed on each day that serum estradiol (E-2) was drawn during COH. Main Outcome Measure(s): Relationship between the rate of COH AMH change [Delta ng/mL per day] (stratified into tertiles), and ovarian response, and pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): During COH, AMH declined. Age and ovarian reserve testing were associated with the rate of AMH decline (RAD). Women with intermediate and minimal RAD had statistically significantly fewer follicles >= 12 mm, lower peak serum E-2, fewer oocytes, and inferior early embryo development compared with women with the greatest RAD. Compared with patients with the lowest RAD, clinical pregnancy was more likely in patients with the greatest RAD in the total population (adjusted odds ratio 3.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.03, 11.94) and among patients older than 35 years (adjusted odds ratio 6.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.09, 44.1). Conclusion(s): The rate of COH AMH decline was associated with ovarian reserve testing, oocyte yield, embryo progression, and clinical pregnancy rates, particularly in women older than 35 years. These results suggest that dynamic AMH levels may provide a novel intracycle approach to predict response and treatment outcomes after IVF. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Effect of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hyperstimulation during in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J].
Fan, Minghui ;
Ma, Lin .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) :322-U130
[22]   Can highly sensitive antimullerian hormone testing predict failed response to ovarian stimulation? [J].
Burks, Heather R. ;
Ross, Lauren ;
Opper, Neisha ;
Paulson, Erika ;
Stanczyk, Frank Z. ;
Chung, Karine .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) :643-648
[23]   Effect of Length of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Using a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on in Vitro Fertilization Pregnancy Rates [J].
Royster, G. Donald ;
Retzloff, Matthew G. ;
Robinson, Randal D. ;
King, Jeremy A. ;
Propst, Anthony M. .
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 57 (9-10) :415-420
[24]   Elevated antimullerian hormone levels are not associated with preterm delivery after in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction [J].
Kim, Anne E. ;
Simoni, Michael K. ;
Nadgauda, Ashni ;
Koelper, Nathanael ;
Dokras, Anuja .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (05) :1013-1022
[25]   In vitro fertilization versus conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [J].
Bouet, P-E ;
Legendre, G. ;
Delbos, L. ;
Dreux, C. ;
Jeanneteau, P. ;
Ferre-L'Hotellier, V ;
Boucret, L. ;
Descamps, P. ;
May-Panloup, P. .
GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (02) :118-123
[26]   Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization [J].
Nardo, Luciano G. ;
Gelbaya, Tarek A. ;
Wilkinson, Hannah ;
Roberts, Stephen A. ;
Yates, Allen. ;
Pemberton, Phil ;
Laing, Ian .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (05) :1586-1593
[27]   Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antimullerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection [J].
Arce, Joan-Carles ;
Andersen, Anders Nyboe ;
Fernandez-Sanchez, Manuel ;
Visnova, Hana ;
Bosch, Ernesto ;
Garcia-Velasco, Juan Antonio ;
Barri, Pedro ;
de Sutter, Petra ;
Klein, Bjarke M. ;
Fauser, Bart C. J. M. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (06) :1633-U456
[28]   Dynamics of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels during the luteal phase of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [J].
Fanchin, R ;
Lozano, DHM ;
Louafi, N ;
Achour-Frydman, N ;
Frydman, R ;
Taieb, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) :747-751
[29]   The Impact of Salpingectomy on Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels and Ovarian Response of In Vitro Fertilization Patients [J].
Gluck, Ohad ;
Tamayev, Liliya ;
Torem, Maya ;
Bar, Jacob ;
Raziel, Arieh ;
Sagiv, Ron .
ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (08) :509-512
[30]   Anti-Mullerian hormone dynamics during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and optimal timing of measurement for outcome prediction [J].
Lee, Jung Ryeol ;
Kim, Seok Hyun ;
Kim, Sun Mie ;
Jee, Byung Chul ;
Ku, Seung-Yup ;
Suh, Chang Suk ;
Choi, Young Min ;
Kim, Jung Gu ;
Moon, Shin Yong .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (10) :2597-2604