Switching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus maintaining entecavir for chronic hepatitis B

被引:42
|
作者
Hagiwara, Satoru . [1 ]
Nishida, Naoshi [1 ]
Ida, Hiroshi [1 ]
Ueshima, Kazuomi [1 ]
Minami, Yasunori [1 ]
Takita, Masahiro [1 ]
Komeda, Yoriaki [1 ]
Kudo, Masatoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kindai Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Fac Med, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osakasayama, Osaka 5898511, Japan
关键词
entecavir hydrate; hepatitis B virus; N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RISK; PHARMACOKINETICS; THERAPY; ANTIGEN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.25515
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a newly developed prodrug of tenofovir (TFV). We divided 48 chronic hepatitis B patients who had taken entecavir (ETV) for >= 2 years into two groups: the ETV continuation (n = 24) and the TAF switching (n = 24) groups, and compared the antiviral effects and safety until 48 weeks after the start of the study. There were no significant differences in the alterations in the serum levels of HBs antigen (HBsAg) level between the ETV continuation and the TAF switching groups at 24 or 48 weeks. We also examined the effect of baseline HBsAg level on the decrease of HBsAg during the treatment; in the TAF switching group, the decrease of HBsAg level at 48 weeks was more significant in patients with low baseline HBsAg (<800 IU/mL) than those with high baseline HBsAg (>800 IU/mL) (change of HBsAg; - 0.029 vs - 0.132 for high and low baseline HBsAg, respectively, P = .007). Also, the effect on renal function was found to be comparable between the TAF switch group and the ETV continuation group. In this study, switching from ETV to TAF may represent higher efficacy for a decrease of HBsAg than a continuation of ETV among the patients with low baseline HBsAg level.
引用
收藏
页码:1804 / 1810
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in clinical practice with entecavir or tenofovir
    Ridruejo, Ezequiel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (23) : 7169 - 7180
  • [22] Tenofovir Versus Entecavir for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in an International Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B
    Hsu, Yao-Chun
    Wong, Grace Lai-Hung
    Chen, Chong
    Peng, Cheng-Yuan
    Yeh, Ming-Lun
    Cheung, Ka-Shing
    Toyoda, Hidenori
    Huang, Chung-Feng
    Huy Trinh
    Xie, Qing
    Enomoto, Masaru
    Liu, Li
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    Kozuka, Ritsuzo
    Tsai, Pei-Chien
    Huang, Yen-Tsung
    Wong, Christopher
    Huang, Rui
    Jang, Tyng-Yuan
    Hoang, Joseph
    Yang, Hwai-, I
    Li, Jiayi
    Lee, Dong-Hyun
    Takahashi, Hirokazu
    Zhang, Jian Q.
    Ogawa, Eiichi
    Zhao, Changqing
    Liu, Chenghai
    Furusyo, Norihiro
    Eguchi, Yuichiro
    Wong, Clifford
    Wu, Chao
    Kumada, Takashi
    Yuen, Man-Fung
    Yu, Ming-Lung
    Nguyen, Mindie H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 (02) : 271 - 280
  • [23] Efficacy of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive hepatitis B patients
    Hye Yeon Chon
    Sang Hoon Ahn
    Yoon Jun Kim
    Jung-Hwan Yoon
    Jeong-Hoon Lee
    Dong Hyun Sinn
    Seung Up Kim
    Hepatology International, 2021, 15 : 1328 - 1336
  • [24] Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Chronic Hepatitis B
    Guzelbulut, Fatih
    Ovunc, Ayse Oya Kurdas
    Cetinkaya, Zuleyha Akkan
    Senates, Ebubekir
    Gokden, Yasemin
    Salturk, Ayca Gokcen Degirmenci
    Sezikli, Mesut
    Ozkara, Selvinaz
    Cetinkaya, Fuat
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (114) : 477 - 480
  • [25] Efficacy of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive hepatitis B patients
    Chon, Hye Yeon
    Ahn, Sang Hoon
    Kim, Yoon Jun
    Yoon, Jung-Hwan
    Lee, Jeong-Hoon
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Seung Up
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 15 (06) : 1328 - 1336
  • [26] Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir plus entecavir combination therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis patients with partial virological response to entecavir
    Wang, Yong-Hong
    Liao, Juan
    Zhang, Dong-Mei
    Wu, Dong-Bo
    Tao, Ya-Chao
    Wang, Meng-Lan
    Chen, En-Qiang
    Tang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 92 (03) : 302 - 308
  • [27] Virologic Response and Safety of Tenofovir Versus Entecavir in Treatment-Naive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients
    Yu, Hyung Min
    Kwon, So Young
    Kim, Jiwan
    Chung, Hyun Ah
    Kwon, Se Woong
    Jeong, Taek Gun
    An, Sang Hee
    Jeong, Gyung Won
    Yun, Seon Ung
    Min, Jae Ki
    Kim, Jeong Han
    Choe, Won Hyeok
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (03) : 146 - 151
  • [28] Switching from combination therapy with entecavir hydrate plus tenofovir alafenamide fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B based on nucleotide sequences of hepatitis B virus pregenome RNA
    Yamada, Shunsuke
    Uchida, Yoshihito
    Kouyama, Jun-Ichi
    Naiki, Kayoko
    Tsuji, Shohei
    Uemura, Hayato
    Sugawara, Kayoko
    Nakayama, Nobuaki
    Imai, Yukinori
    Tomiya, Tomoaki
    Mizuno, Suguru
    Mochida, Satoshi
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 54 (10) : 877 - 887
  • [29] Retreatment Efficacy and Renal Safety of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Entecavir, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate After Entecavir or Tenofovir Cessation
    Shao-Ming Chiu
    Kuo-Chin Chang
    Tsung-Hui Hu
    Chao-Hung Hung
    Jing-Houng Wang
    Sheng-Nan Lu
    Chien-Hung Chen
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2023, 68 : 665 - 675
  • [30] Impact of tenofovir alafenamide vs. entecavir on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B
    Hye Won Lee
    Young Youn Cho
    Hyein Lee
    Jae Seung Lee
    Seung Up Kim
    Jun Yong Park
    Do Young Kim
    Sang Hoon Ahn
    Beom Kyung Kim
    Soo Young Park
    Hepatology International, 2021, 15 : 1083 - 1092