Reasons for Re-Excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: Insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons MasterySM Database

被引:106
作者
Landercasper, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Whitacre, Eric [3 ]
Degnim, Amy C. [4 ]
Al-Hamadani, Mohammed [5 ]
机构
[1] Gundersen Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Gundersen Hlth Syst, Norma J Vinger Ctr Breast Care, La Crosse, WI USA
[3] Breast Ctr Southern Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Gundersen Hlth Syst, Dept Med Res, La Crosse, WI USA
关键词
CONSERVING SURGERY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; QUALITY MEASURES; MARGIN STATUS; CONSERVATION SURGERY; SURGICAL MARGINS; THERAPY; RATES; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-014-3905-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. There is marked variability of re-excision rates after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer. Reasons for re-excision and variability across surgeons have not been well documented. We hypothesized the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Mastery(SM) Program can identify reasons for re-excision. Methods. Data from January 1 to 7 November 2013 were evaluated in the ASBrS Mastery(SM) Program to determine re-excision lumpectomy rate (RELR). On 1 June 2013, a tool to track reasons for re-excision was developed. Variation in re-excision rate by surgeon and patient characteristics was performed by Chi square test and Fisher's test for univariate analysis, then logistic regression with backwards elimination method for multivariate analysis. Results. For 6,725 patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for cancer, 328 surgeons reported 1,451 (21.6 %) patients had one or more re-excisions. The most common reasons for re-excision were ink positive margins in 783 (49.7 %), margin <1 mm (34.3 %), and margin 1-2 mm (7.2 %). By multivariate analysis, re-excision rates were lower in patients aged less than 35 years, with White (non-) Hispanic ethnicity, and, among surgeons in solo practice, more years in practice and higher-volume practice. Conclusion. Half of re-excisions after initial lumpectomy were performed for margins that are positive. Most of the remainder were for negative close (<1-2 mm) margins. This information corroborates surgeon survey data regarding reasons for re-excision and provides proof of concept the Mastery(SM) Program can capture surgical outcome data in real time, providing opportunity and a method for future performance improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:3185 / 3191
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates [J].
Azu, Michelle ;
Abrahamse, Paul ;
Katz, Steven J. ;
Jagsi, Reshma ;
Morrow, Monica .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) :558-563
[2]  
Berry LL, 1999, DISCOVERING SOUL SER, P12
[3]   The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost [J].
Berwick, Donald M. ;
Nolan, Thomas W. ;
Whittington, John .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) :759-769
[4]   Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery [J].
Birkmeyer, John D. ;
Finks, Jonathan F. ;
O'Reilly, Amanda ;
Oerline, Mary ;
Carlin, Arthur M. ;
Nunn, Andre R. ;
Dimick, Justin ;
Banerjee, Mousumi ;
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (15) :1434-1442
[5]   Attaining Negative Margins in Breast-Conservation Operations: Is There a Consensus among Breast Surgeons? [J].
Blair, Sarah L. ;
Thompson, Kari ;
Rococco, Joseph ;
Malcarne, Vanessa ;
Beitsch, Peter D. ;
Ollila, David W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (05) :608-613
[6]   Optical Spectral Surveillance of Breast Tissue Landscapes for Detection of Residual Disease in Breast Tumor Margins [J].
Brown, J. Quincy ;
Bydlon, Torre M. ;
Kennedy, Stephanie A. ;
Caldwell, Matthew L. ;
Gallagher, Jennifer E. ;
Junker, Marlee ;
Wilke, Lee G. ;
Barry, William T. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Ramanujam, Nimmi .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07)
[7]   Early Results from a Novel Quality Outcomes Program: The American Society of Breast Surgeons' Mastery of Breast Surgery [J].
Clifford, Edward J. ;
De Vol, Edward B. ;
Pockaj, Barbara A. ;
Wilke, Lee G. ;
Boughey, Judy C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 :S233-S241
[8]   The Safety of Multiple Re-excisions after Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer [J].
Coopey, Suzanne ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Hanson, Stephanie ;
Buckley, Julliette ;
Hughes, Kevin S. ;
Gadd, Michele ;
Specht, Michelle C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (13) :3797-3801
[9]   Lumpectomy Cavity Shaved Margins Do Not Impact Re-excision Rates in Breast Cancer Patients [J].
Coopey, Suzanne B. ;
Buckley, Julliette M. ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Hughes, Kevin S. ;
Gadd, Michele A. ;
Specht, Michelle C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) :3036-3040
[10]   Quality indicators in breast cancer care [J].
Del Turco, M. Rosselli ;
Ponti, A. ;
Bick, U. ;
Biganzoli, L. ;
Cserni, G. ;
Cutuli, B. ;
Decker, T. ;
Dietel, M. ;
Gentilini, O. ;
Kuehn, T. ;
Mano, M. P. ;
Mantellini, P. ;
Marotti, L. ;
Poortmans, P. ;
Rank, F. ;
Roe, H. ;
Scaffidi, E. ;
van der Hage, J. A. ;
Viale, G. ;
Wells, C. ;
Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M. ;
Wengstom, Y. ;
Cataliotti, L. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (13) :2344-2356