Identifying trade-offs between socio-economic and environmental factors for bioenergy crop production: A case study from northern Kentucky

被引:15
作者
Nepal, Sandhya [1 ]
Tran, Liem T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Geog, Burchfiel Geog Bldg Room 304, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Bioenergy; Trade-offs; Optimization; Sustainability; Decisions; Kentucky; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAINS; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bioenergy crops can provide a reliable and adequate supply of biomass feedstocks to support the bioenergy industry. However, promoting bioenergy crops would require major change in land use and management practices that can have long term socio-economic and environmental impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate potential opportunities and challenges presented by bioenergy crop production. We developed a multi-objective optimization model to analyze trade-offs among various components of bioenergy crop production to help make better production decisions. Our model integrated sustainability dimensions including social, economic and environmental factors for bioenergy crop production. As bioenergy crop production may incorporate various objectives, we ran the model by optimizing one objective at a time to measure the magnitude of change in one objective with respect to change in other objectives given a set of constraints. In addition, our model had the ability to assess how trade-offs would be affected by chancing preferences for different factors in the production decisions. The model was applied for a four-county study area in northern Kentucky and it provided a regional examination for the potential of bioenergy crops for energy production. The model can serve as an effective tool for making bioenergy production planning and management decisions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 283
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, SO26 USDA FOR SERV S
[2]  
Bernardi A., 2012, IND ENG CHEM RES, V35, P1782
[3]   Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production [J].
Bonsch, Markus ;
Humpenoeder, Florian ;
Popp, Alexander ;
Bodirsky, Benjamin ;
Dietrich, Jan Philipp ;
Rolinski, Susanne ;
Biewald, Anne ;
Lotze-Campen, Hermann ;
Weindl, Isabelle ;
Gerten, Dieter ;
Stevanovic, Miodrag .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01) :11-24
[4]  
Bookhout T. A., 2012, TECHNICAL REV
[5]   Woody bioenergy crop selection can have large effects on water yield: A southeastern United States case study [J].
Caldwell, P. V. ;
Jackson, C. R. ;
Miniat, C. F. ;
Younger, S. E. ;
Vining, J. A. ;
McDonnell, J. J. ;
Aubrey, D. P. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 117 :180-189
[6]  
DOE/Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), 2016, NEW STUD WAT SAV PLA
[7]   Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects [J].
Domac, J ;
Richards, LK ;
Risovic, S .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (02) :97-106
[8]   Multiobjective optimization of biorefineries with economic and safety objectives [J].
El-Halwagi, Ali M. ;
Rosas, Camilo ;
Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose ;
Jimenez-Gutierrez, Arturo ;
Mannan, Mahboobul S. ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (07) :2427-2434
[9]  
English B.C., 2013, Economics Research International, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2013/138485, 10.1155/2013/138485]
[10]  
FAO, 2012, IMP BIOEN FOOD SEC G, P52