Numerical Investigation of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Based on Lattice Spring Model

被引:6
作者
Zhao, Kaikai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Pengfei [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Feng, Yanjun [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sun, Xiaodong [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Cheng, Lixing [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zheng, Jianwei [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] China Coal Res Inst, Coal Min & Designing Branch, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Engn Geol & Resource Geotech Grp, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[3] State Key Lab Coal Min & Clean Utilizat, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[4] Tiandi Sci & Technol Co Ltd, Coal Min & Designing Dept, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[5] CCTEG Coal Min Res Inst, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FINITE-ELEMENT-METHOD; SIMULATION; XFEM; MECHANISMS; BEHAVIOR; BRITTLE; NETWORK; 3D;
D O I
10.1155/2020/8845990
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Hydraulic fracturing has been extensively employed for permeability enhancement in low-permeability reservoirs. The geometry of the hydraulic fracture network (HFN) may have implications for the optimization of hydraulic fracturing operations. Various parameters, including the in situ stress, treatment parameters (injection rate and fluid viscosity), and orientation of natural fractures (NFs), can significantly affect the interactions between hydraulic fracture (HF) and NFs and the final HFN. In this study, a lattice-spring code was employed to determine the impact of various parameters on the geometry of the HFN. The modelling results indicated that with a large stress difference, the global orientation of the fracture propagation was restricted to the direction of maximum principal stress, and the number of fracture branches was reduced. The geometry of the HFN changed from circular to elliptical. In contrast, with an increase in the fluid viscosity/injection rate, the evolution of the geometry of the HFN exhibited the opposite trend. The global orientation of HF propagation tended to remain parallel to the direction of maximum principal stress, regardless of the branching and tortuosity of the fracture. The variations in the ratio of tensile fracture (HF) to shear fracture (shear slip on NF) can be significant, depending on the stress state, treatment parameters, and preexisting NF network, which determine the dominant stimulation mechanism. This study provides insight into the HF propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abbas S., 2014, SPE HYDR FRACT TECHN, DOI [10.2118/168622-MS, DOI 10.2118/168622-MS]
[2]   Pore pressure stress coupling in 3D and consequences for reservoir stress states and fault reactivation [J].
Altmann, J. B. ;
Mueller, B. I. R. ;
Mueller, T. M. ;
Heidbach, O. ;
Tingay, M. R. P. ;
Weisshardt, A. .
GEOTHERMICS, 2014, 52 :195-205
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, P 6 UNC RES TECHN C, DOI DOI 10.15530/URTEC-2018-2900807
[4]   Lattice Numerical Simulations of Lab-Scale Hydraulic Fracture and Natural Interface Interaction [J].
Bakhshi, E. ;
Rasouli, V. ;
Ghorbani, A. ;
Marji, M. Fatehi ;
Damjanac, B. ;
Wan, X. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2019, 52 (05) :1315-1337
[5]  
Beugelsdijk L.J. L., 2000, Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management, P177, DOI [DOI 10.2523/59419-MS, 10.2523/59419-ms, 10.2118/59419-MS, DOI 10.2118/59419-MS]
[6]  
[陈勉 Chen Mian], 2008, [石油学报, Acta Petrolei Sinica], V29, P431
[7]   Effect of Joint Geometrical Parameters on Hydraulic Fracture Network Propagation in Naturally Jointed Shale Reservoirs [J].
Chong, Zhaohui ;
Yao, Qiangling ;
Li, Xuehua .
GEOFLUIDS, 2018,
[8]   An XFEM element to model intersections between hydraulic and natural fractures in porous rocks [J].
Cruz, Francisco ;
Roehl, Deane ;
Vargas Jr, Euripedes do Amaral .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2018, 112 :385-397
[9]  
Cundall P A., 2011, 2 INT FLACDEM S CONT
[10]   Application of particle and lattice codes to simulation of hydraulic fracturing [J].
Damjanac, Branko ;
Detournay, Christine ;
Cundall, Peter A. .
COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS, 2016, 3 (02) :249-261