Glaucoma Screening Using Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect

被引:15
作者
Charalel, Resmi A. [1 ]
Lin, Hugh S. [1 ]
Singh, Kuldev [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
glaucoma; swinging flashlight; RAPD; screening; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; COST-ANALYSIS; THICKNESS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a9742
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) by swinging flashlight as a potentially useful screening test for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Methods: One hundred seven subjects prospectively recruited from a mixed population of glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous patients were examined for a RAPD by 1 individual masked with regard to disease presence. All subjects underwent a swinging flashlight test with, when necessary, the aid of neutral density filters, to determine whether or not a RAPD was present. A determination of glaucoma diagnosis, as well as classification of disease stage, was subsequently assessed based upon review of history and ophthalmic examination. This clinical information regarding glaucomatous disease was ascertained without knowledge of study RAPD status. The acquisition of such clinical information and performance of swinging flashlight testing for RAPD was conducted by different individuals with the latter being a nonophthalmologist. Results: Statistical analysis demonstrated an odds ratio of 9.71 (95% CI, 3.72-25.40) for glaucomatous disease if a RAPD was present, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 82.9%. Subanalysis of patients who had not previously undergone cataract surgery revealed an odds ratio of 17.05 (95% CI, 4.73-61.44) for glaucomatous disease if a RAPD was present, with a sensitivity of 68.8% and a specificity of 88.6%. Conclusions: RAPD screening by a swinging flashlight test with neutral density filters was moderately sensitive and strongly specific for glaucoma. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value improved when patients who had previously undergone cataract surgery were removed from the analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting
    Andreou, P. A.
    Wickremasinghe, S. S.
    Asaria, R. H.
    Tay, E.
    Franks, W. A.
    [J]. EYE, 2007, 21 (08) : 1050 - 1055
  • [2] Bowd C, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, P1993
  • [3] Pupil assessment in optic nerve disorders
    Bremner, FD
    [J]. EYE, 2004, 18 (11) : 1175 - 1181
  • [4] Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty: results from a 1-year randomised clinical trial
    Damji, K. F.
    Bovell, A. M.
    Hodge, W. G.
    Rock, W.
    Shah, K.
    Buhrmann, R.
    Pan, Y. I.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (12) : 1490 - 1494
  • [5] Cost analysis of glaucoma medications
    Fiscella, Richard G.
    Jensen, Michael K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 145 (06) : 1108 - 1109
  • [6] GRANT WM, 1982, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V89, P991
  • [7] Long-term Comparison of Primary Trabeculectomy With 5-Fluorouracil Versus Mitomycin C in West Africa
    Kim, Hanna Y.
    Egbert, Peter R.
    Singh, Kuldev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (07) : 578 - 583
  • [8] Kooner KS, 2008, CLIN OPHTHALMOL, V2, P757
  • [9] Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease
    Mills, RP
    Budenz, DL
    Lee, PP
    Noecker, RJ
    Walt, JG
    Siegartel, LR
    Evans, SJ
    Doyle, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [10] Screening Tests for Detecting Open-Angle Glaucoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mowatt, Graham
    Burr, Jennifer M.
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Siddiqui, M. A. Rehman
    Ramsay, Craig
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Grp, O. A. G. Screening Project
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2008, 49 (12) : 5373 - 5385