Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine: 20 years of progress

被引:64
作者
Kahan, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sch Med, Div Immunol & Organ Transplantat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.01.091
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Since its introduction 20 years ago, cyclosporine (CyA), a powerful immunosuppressant with a narrow therapeutic window, remains the cornerstone of many drug regimens in renal transplantation. However, attempts to balance its therapeutic value with its pleiotropic side effects continue to challenge clinicians. To address the wide intraindividual and interindividual differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of the oil-based formulation of CyA (Sandimmune), a microemulsion (Neoral) was introduced; it displayed better absorption and lower intraindividual variability. Neoral also improves the utility of therapeutic monitoring of CyA to estimate exposure to the drug and predict patient outcomes. Drug monitoring techniques are undergoing continual refinement: today, a limited sampling strategy-C-2 monitoring-shows great promise as a comparatively simple, safe, and effective method to optimize patient outcomes during both short-term and maintenance CyA therapy. However, it is not clear whether this method is useful for treatment optimization with generic formulations of CyA. Although generic substitutes meet federal bioequivalence criteria,they may not display the same pharmacokinetic properties. Further, preliminary data have shown a 10% lower 1-year graft survival rate among patients treated with generic versus Neoral CyA. Current challenges in optimizing CyA therapy include determining pretransplant patient characteristics relevant to selection of the appropriate exposure or the development of a Bayesian forecasting technique that predicts dose adjustments necessary to achieve the optimal drug regimen during the critical period immediately posttransplant.
引用
收藏
页码:378S / 391S
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Report of the American Society of Transplantation conference on immunosuppressive drugs and the use of generic immunosuppressants
    Alloway, RR
    Isaacs, R
    Lake, K
    Hoyer, P
    First, R
    Helderman, H
    Bunnapradist, S
    Leichtman, A
    Bennett, MW
    Tejani, A
    Takemoto, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (10) : 1211 - 1215
  • [2] Amante AJ, 1996, CLIN CHEM, V42, P1294
  • [3] The pharmacokinetics of a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine in primary renal allograft recipients
    Barone, G
    Chang, CT
    Choc, MG
    Klein, JB
    Marsh, CL
    Meligeni, JA
    Min, DI
    Pescovitz, MD
    Pollak, R
    Pruett, TL
    Stinson, JB
    Thompson, JS
    Vasquez, E
    Waid, T
    Wombolt, DG
    Wong, RL
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 61 (06) : 875 - 880
  • [4] C2 therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine:: Sources of variability
    Billaud, EM
    Antoine, C
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (07) : 2828 - 2830
  • [5] THERAPEUTIC MONITORING FOR CYCLOSPORINE - DIFFICULTIES IN ESTABLISHING A THERAPEUTIC WINDOW
    BOWERS, LD
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 24 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [6] CALNE RY, 1978, LANCET, V2, P1323
  • [7] Feasibility of changing therapeutic cyclosporine monitoring from C0 to C2 in stable renal recipients:: Narrower coefficient of variation with C2 monitoring
    Chueh, SC
    Liao, CH
    Chang, CJ
    Lai, MK
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3100 - 3101
  • [8] C2 single-point sampling to evaluate cyclosporine exposure in long-term renal transplant recipients
    Citterio, F
    Scatà, MC
    Borzi, MT
    Pozzetto, U
    Castagneto, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) : 3133 - 3136
  • [9] COLE E, 2001, AM J TRANSPLANT, V1, P190
  • [10] Neoral monitoring 2 hours post-dose and the pediatric transplant patient
    Dunn, SP
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 7 (01) : 25 - 30