Development and Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in Portugal

被引:41
作者
Canavarro, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Serra, Adriano Vaz [2 ]
Simoes, Mario R.
Rijo, Daniel
Pereira, Marco [1 ]
Gameiro, Sofia [5 ]
Quartilho, Manuel Joao [2 ]
Quintais, Luis [3 ]
Carona, Carlos [4 ]
Paredes, Tiago [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, FCT SFRH BD 19126 2004, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Fac Med, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Anthropol, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Portuguese Assoc Cerebral Palsy NRC APPC, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, FCT SFRH BD 21584 2005, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
[6] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, FCT SFRH BD 32380 2006, P-3001802 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Quality of Life; World Health Organization; Assessment; Focus Groups; Psychometric studies; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12529-008-9024-2
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
At the beginning of the 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a project in order to create a cross-cultural instrument of quality of life assessment: the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL). This paper describes the development of the European Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-100, according to the methodology recommended by the WHO. Special attention is given to the qualitative pilot study, which led to the development of the Portuguese Facet [Political P], and to the empirical pilot study and the psychometric studies, based on the application of the Portuguese version of the instrument to a sample of 315 subjects from the general population and 289 patients. The assessment protocol also included the Beck Depression Inventory and the Brief Symptom Inventory. The Portuguese version of WHOQOL-100 showed acceptable internal consistency (alpha range 0.84-0.94) and test-retest reliability in all domains (r range 0.67-0.86). Discriminant validity was significant for all domains, except in Spirituality. Convergent validity with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Brief Symptom Inventory was satisfactory for most domains. The WHOQOL showed good psychometric characteristics, suggesting that the Portuguese version of WHOQOL is valid and reliable in the assessment of quality of life in Portugal.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 124
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The Reliability and Validity of World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL) in Patients with Breast Cancer: Physical Domain and Depression [J].
Park, E-Jin ;
Moon, Eun Jeong ;
Choi, Hoon ;
Oh, Se Jeong ;
Jeon, Yang-Whan ;
Han, Sang-Ick .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2010, 13 (04) :431-436
[32]   Validation and reliability of the Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) in the hospitalized trauma population [J].
Kruithof, N. ;
Haagsma, J. A. ;
Karabatzakis, M. ;
Cnossen, M. C. ;
de Munter, L. ;
van de Ree, C. L. P. ;
de Jongh, M. A. C. ;
Polinder, S. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (10) :1796-1804
[33]   Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-AGE Scale in Singapore [J].
Rachael Zhi Yi Lee ;
Winson Fu Zun Yang ;
Rathi Mahendran ;
Lidia Suárez .
European Journal of Ageing, 2024, 21
[34]   Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-AGE Scale in Singapore [J].
Lee, Rachael Zhi Yi ;
Yang, Winson Fu Zun ;
Mahendran, Rathi ;
Suarez, Lidia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2024, 21 (01)
[35]   Quality of life in Vietnamese young adults: A validation analysis of the World Health Organization's quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument [J].
Vu, Linh Gia ;
Nguyen, Long Hoang ;
Nguyen, Cuong Tat ;
Vu, Giang Thu ;
Latkin, Carl A. ;
Ho, Roger C. M. ;
Ho, Cyrus S. H. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
[36]   A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation [J].
O'Carroll, RE ;
Smith, K ;
Couston, M ;
Cossar, JA ;
Hayes, PC .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (01) :121-124
[37]   A comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF in detecting change in quality of life following liver transplantation [J].
R.E. O'Carroll ;
K. Smith ;
M. Couston ;
J.A. Cossar ;
P.C. Hayes .
Quality of Life Research, 2000, 9 :121-124
[38]   Quality of Life in the Decayed Historic Areas of Isfahan (DHI) Using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) [J].
Homayoon Nooraie ;
Manuchehr Tabibian .
Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2012, 7 :371-390
[39]   The minimal clinical important difference in the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument—100 [J].
Brenda L. Den Oudsten ;
Wobbe P. Zijlstra ;
Jolanda De Vries .
Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013, 21 :1295-1301
[40]   Quality of life among an Iranian general population sample using the World Health Organization's quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) [J].
Nedjat, Saharnaz ;
Naieni, Kourosh Hakouie ;
Mohammad, Kazem ;
Majdzadeh, Reza ;
Montazeri, Ali .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 56 (01) :55-61