The Short-Term Impacts of the Philadelphia Beverage Tax on Beverage Consumption

被引:107
作者
Zhong, Yichen [1 ]
Auchincloss, Amy H. [1 ]
Lee, Brian K. [1 ]
Kanter, Genevieve P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGES; EXCISE TAX; OBESITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; PREVALENCE; BERKELEY; HEALTH; REDUCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.017
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: On January 1, 2017, Philadelphia implemented a beverage tax of $0.015/ounce on sugar ("regular") and sugar-substitute ("diet") beverages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate impact of the tax on residents' consumption of soda, fruit drinks, energy drinks, and bottled water. Methods: A repeat cross-sectional study design used data from a random-digit-dialing phone survey during a no-tax period (December 6-31, 2016) and a tax period (January 15-February 31, 2017) among 899 respondents in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 878 respondents in three nearby comparison cities. Survey questions included frequency and volume of bottled water and beverages. Outcomes were daily consumption, and 30-day consumption frequency and volume. Propensity score-weighted difference-in-differences regression was used to control for secular time trend and confounding. Covariates were sociodemographics, BMI, health status, smoking, and alcohol use. Analyses were conducted in 2017. Results: Within the first 2 months of tax implementation, relative to the comparison cities, in Philadelphia the odds of daily consumption of regular soda was 40% lower (OR=0.6, 95% CI=0.37, 0.97); energy drink was 64% lower (OR=0.36, 95% CI=0.17, 0.76); bottled water was 58% higher (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.13, 2.20); and the 30-day regular soda consumption frequency was 38% lower (ratio of consumption frequency=0.62, 95% CI=0.40, 0.98). Conclusions: Early results suggest that the tax influenced daily consumption of regular soda, energy drinks, and bottled water. Future studies are needed to evaluate longer-term impact of the tax on sugared beverage consumption and substitutions. (C) 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR), Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NBER WORKING PAPER S
[3]  
[Anonymous], Drinking Levels Defined
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOD TAX WILL YOUR FA
[5]  
[Anonymous], AM COMM SURV 5 YEAR
[6]   Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study [J].
Arantxa Colchero, M. ;
Popkin, Barry M. ;
Rivera, Juan A. ;
Ng, Shu Wen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[7]   Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (25) :3083-3107
[8]   Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies [J].
Azad, Meghan B. ;
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ;
Chauhan, Bhupendrasinh F. ;
Rabbani, Rasheda ;
Lys, Justin ;
Copstein, Leslie ;
Mann, Amrinder ;
Jeyaraman, Maya M. ;
Reid, Ashleigh E. ;
Fiander, Michelle ;
MacKay, Dylan S. ;
McGavock, Jon ;
Wicklow, Brandy ;
Zarychanski, Ryan .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (28) :E929-E939
[9]  
Brady N., BOULDER BEGINS TAXIN
[10]   The Public Health and Economic Benefits of Taxing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages [J].
Brownell, Kelly D. ;
Farley, Thomas ;
Willett, Walter C. ;
Popkin, Barry M. ;
Chaloupka, Frank J. ;
Thompson, Joseph W. ;
Ludwig, David S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (16) :1599-1605