Glossary for randomized clinical trials

被引:4
作者
Nagendrababu, V. [1 ]
Duncan, H. F. [2 ]
Pulikkotil, S. J. [3 ]
Dummer, P. M. H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Coll Dent Med, Dept Prevent & Restorat Dent, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dublin Dent Univ Hosp, Div Restorat Dent, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Int Med Univ, Sch Dent, Div Clin Dent, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Cardiff Univ, Coll Biomed & Life Sci, Sch Dent, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
Endodontics; glossary; randomized clinical trials; ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; ALLOCATION; BIAS; OUTCOMES; DESIGN; STATISTICS; JOURNALS; STANDARD; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/iej.13434
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Randomized clinical trials are positioned at the highest level of primary clinical evidence, as they are designed to be unbiased with a reduced risk of systematic error. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first developed in 1996 to improve the reporting quality of randomized clinical trials with updates being published subsequently. Recently, the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 guidelines were developed exclusively for the field of Endodontics to address the suboptimal quality of randomized clinical trials submitted to Endodontic journals, which result in many being rejected. A principal flaw in submissions is the fact that many authors are unclear on the keys terms that should be used when developing manuscripts for publication. Clearly, authors should be aware of the most common terms used when conducting and reporting randomized clinical trials. Hence, the aim of the current paper is to present a comprehensive glossary of the terminology used in randomized clinical trials in order to assist authors when designing, executing and writing-up randomized clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 365
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [61] Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955-2013
    Saltaji, Humam
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Cummings, Greta G.
    Amin, Maryam
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [62] Randomized Controlled Trials and Challenge Trials: Design and Criterion for Validity
    Sargeant, J. M.
    Kelton, D. F.
    O'Connor, A. M.
    [J]. ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 61 : 18 - 27
  • [63] Epidemiology 1 - Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical
    Schulz, KF
    Grimes, DA
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9467) : 1348 - 1353
  • [64] Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what
    Schulz, KF
    Grimes, DA
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9307) : 696 - 700
  • [65] The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials: a review
    Scott, NW
    McPherson, GC
    Ramsay, CR
    Campbell, MK
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (06): : 662 - 674
  • [66] Skelly Andrea C, 2012, Evid Based Spine Care J, V3, P9, DOI 10.1055/s-0031-1298595
  • [67] Smith P.G., 2015, FIELD TRIALS HLTH IN, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED/9780198732860.003.0011
  • [68] Assessing the Generalizability of Randomized Trial Results to Target Populations
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Bradshaw, Catherine P.
    Leaf, Philip J.
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2015, 16 (03) : 475 - 485
  • [69] Sullivan Gail M, 2012, J Grad Med Educ, V4, P279, DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
  • [70] Suresh Kp, 2011, J Hum Reprod Sci, V4, P8, DOI 10.4103/0974-1208.82352