Motivation for reading comprehension

被引:87
作者
Anmarkrud, Oistein [1 ]
Braten, Ivar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Inst Educ Res, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Reading motivation; Reading comprehension; Prior knowledge; Strategies; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
In a sample of 104 Norwegian ninth-grade students, we examined whether perceived reading efficacy and reading task Value uniquely predicted the comprehension of a social studies text after variance associated with gender, achievement in the domain, topic knowledge, deeper strategies. and surface strategies had been removed through forced-order hierarchical Multiple regression analysis. Results showed that even after removing variance from these variables, the motivation constructs accounted for additional variance. However. only reading task value was a statistically significant positive predictor of reading comprehension, whereas the relationship between reading efficacy and reading comprehension did not reach statistical significance. Thus, reading task value seems particularly important because it can override the contributions of other important constructs. In terms of education, the findings suggest that an emphasis on cognitive constructs such as prior knowledge and strategic text-processing should not make us overlook the specific importance of promoting motivation for reading comprehension. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 256
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects [J].
Alexander, PA ;
Graham, S ;
Harris, KR .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (02) :129-154
[2]  
Alexander Patricia., 2000, HDB READING RES, V3, P285
[3]  
Bandura A, 1999, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[4]  
Bjornsson C H., 1968, Lasbarhet (readability) liber
[5]  
Block C., 2002, COMPREHENSION INSTRU
[6]   Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students' topic knowledge? [J].
Bråten, I ;
Samuelstuen, MS .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (02) :324-336
[7]  
Braten I.., 2007, METACOGN LEARN, V2, P1
[8]   The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories [J].
Entwistle, N ;
McCune, V .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 16 (04) :325-345
[9]  
Guthrie J.T., 1999, SCI STUD READ, V3, P231, DOI DOI 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0303_3
[10]  
Guthrie J.T., 2000, HDB READING RES, V111, P403