Life Cycle Assessment of Remediation Alternatives for Dredged Sediments

被引:10
作者
Puccini, Monica [1 ]
Seggiani, Maurizia [1 ]
Vitolo, Sandra [1 ]
Iannelli, Renato
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ind, Largo Lucio Lazzarino 2, I-56122 Pisa, Italy
来源
16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION (PRES'13) | 2013年 / 35卷
关键词
SITE REMEDIATION; LCA;
D O I
10.3303/CET1335130
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an ISO standardized and widely used methodology for environmental assessment of products, processes and services, by identifying, quantifying and evaluating all the resources consumed and all the emissions and wastes released. The LCA methodology enables adequate comparison between different remediation options and can be used as a decision-making tool for the authorities. In this study, LCA was used to compare, in terms of their associated environmental burdens, two scenarios for managing the contaminated dredged sediments of the seabed of the Livorno Port area. The compared options were: (i) confined longshore disposal, i.e. placement of dredged material in a confined disposal facility; (ii) phytoremediation treatment, by an association of salt-tolerant shrub and grass species, aimed at turning the polluted sediment an agronomic substrate (techno-soil). The results of the life cycle impact assessment underline that the potential impacts of the two compared options involve different environmental problems. Indeed, for phytoremediation the most significant impacts are related to energy and resources consumption, while for the confined disposal is related to loads in the marine ecotoxicity categories. Therefore, phytoremediation can be considered a promising alternative solution for the management and valorization of contaminated dredged sediments.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 786
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Risk-Based Decision Making to Manage Contaminated Sediments
    Bridges, Todd S.
    Apitz, Sabine E.
    Evison, Leah
    Keckler, Kymberlee
    Logan, Mary
    Nadeau, Steve
    Wenning, Richard J.
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [2] Castiello D, 2008, J AM LEATHER CHEM AS, V103, P1
  • [3] Diamond ML, 1999, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V18, P788, DOI [10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0788:LCFFAO>2.3.CO
  • [4] 2, 10.1002/etc.5620180427]
  • [5] A CAPE Based Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating the Environmental Performance of Non-Food Agro-Processes
    Gillani, Sayed
    Belaud, Jean-Pierre
    Sablayrolles, Caroline
    Montrejaud-Vignoles, Mireille
    Le Lann, Jean-Marc
    [J]. ICHEAP-11: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 32 : 211 - 216
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of Biomass-Derived Resin for Sustainable Chemical Industry
    Mayumi, Kazuya
    Kikuchi, Yasunori
    Hirao, Masahiko
    [J]. CISAP4: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRY, 2010, 19 : 19 - 24
  • [7] LCA for site remediation:: A literature review
    Suèr, P
    Nilsson-Påledal, S
    Norrman, J
    [J]. SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION, 2004, 13 (04): : 415 - 425
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of contaminated sites remediation
    Volkwein S.
    Hurtig H.-W.
    Klöpffer W.
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (5) : 263 - 274
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae in Thailand: Energy Efficiency and Global Warming Impact Reduction
    Wibul, Pharawee
    Malakul, Pomthong
    Pavasant, Prasert
    Kangvansaichol, Kunn
    Papong, Seksan
    [J]. PRES 2012: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2012, 29 : 1183 - 1188