Production analysis of collaborative forest management using an example of joint forest management from Gujarat, India

被引:11
作者
Misra, D [1 ]
Kant, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Forestry, Ctr Earth Sci, Toronto, ON M5S 3B3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
collaborative forest management; India; joint forest management; multiple outputs; non-conventional factors; production function; production possibility surfaces;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A framework for the production analysis of collaborative forest management (CFM) is proposed. The framework has four main features: (i) a social organization, not an industrial organization, responsible for the production process of CFM; (ii) conventional factors (land, labor, and capital) as well as non-conventional factors (social, cultural, and organizational factors) as inputs (iii) social, biological, and economic outputs; and (iv) a production model that includes transformation and transaction components. The framework is used for the production analysis of joint forest management (JFM) in the Gujarat state of India, by estimating the production functions of social, biological, and economic outputs on the basis of data from fifty villages having JFM. The outcomes indicate that the inclusion of non-conventional factors is critical for un-biased analysis, and the contributions of non-conventional factors dominate the contributions of conventional factors. The social output - social empowerment - and the biological output - forest canopy cover - are associate products, the social output and the economic output - supply of forest produce to meet local demand - are rival products, and the biological output and the economic output are associate products, but the degree of association and rivalry between the two outputs are not the same in different ranges. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 320
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
AHMED S, 1995, 83 NGO, P23
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNITY BASED FORE
[3]   A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level [J].
Arthaud, GJ ;
Rose, DW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1996, 26 (12) :2191-2200
[4]   Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons .1. The unregulated case [J].
Baland, JM ;
Platteau, JP .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1997, 49 (04) :451-482
[5]   Moving toward consensus-based forest management: A comparison of industrial, co-managed, community and Small private forests in Canada [J].
Beckley, TM .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1998, 74 (05) :736-744
[6]   COMPARISON OF STOPPING RULES IN FORWARD STEPWISE REGRESSION [J].
BENDEL, RB ;
AFIFI, AA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1977, 72 (357) :46-53
[7]  
BOWES MD, 1989, MULTIPLE USE MANAGEM
[8]  
Brahmi M. K., 1997, Advances in Forestry Research in India, V16, P217
[9]  
Bromley D.W., 1991, ENV EC PROPERTY RIGH
[10]  
CHATURVEDI AN, 1993, WASTELANDS NEWS, P53