Risk analysis for occupational safety and health in the textile industry: Integration of FMEA, FTA, and BIFPET methods

被引:52
作者
Mutlu, Nazli Gulum [1 ]
Altuntas, Serkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Manufacturing system; Risk analysis; Occupational safety and health; FMEA; FTA; BIFPET algorithm; PERT distribution; FAILURE MODE; PROJECT-MANAGEMENT; REASONING APPROACH; FUZZY TOPSIS; RELIABILITY; PRIORITIZATION; MAINTENANCE; ACCIDENTS; PERT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Identifying and managing health and safety risks that threaten personnel in production systems are vital for the continuity and success of organizations. Many tools are used to accurately analyze and assess risks. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the most commonly used tools in different industries. However, the accuracy and reliability of FMEA method have been fairly criticized by many researchers in the field. In this study, an approach based on FMEA that integrates the advantages of the fault tree analysis (FTA) method and belief in fuzzy probability estimations of time (BIFPET) algorithm has been proposed in order to improve the performance of the FMEA method. In order to practically apply the proposed method to real life problems, it has been employed to analyze and assess the potential risks for a finishing process in the fabric dyeing department of a textile company. The performance of the proposed FMEA-FTA-BIFPET method has been compared to the results obtained by FMEA-FTA and FMEA-FTA-program evaluation and review technique (PERT) distribution integrated methods. The results of this study show that failure related to fabric trimming adjustment in the tenter has the highest risk priority number. The proposed approach can be used in various industry for risk analysis. In addition, results obtained by the study have indicated that the proposed approach can be implemented in practice to perform comprehensive risk assessment procedures as it reflects real-life dynamics to analyze and assess potential risk.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 240
页数:19
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP [J].
Abdelgawad, Mohamed ;
Fayek, Aminah Robinson .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 136 (09) :1028-1036
[2]  
Agyei W., 2015, Int J Sci Technol Res, V4, P222
[3]   An integrated risk assessment based on uncertainty analysis for cargo vessel safety [J].
Akyildiz, Hakan ;
Mentes, Ayhan .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 92 :34-43
[4]  
Altuntas S, 2017, J ENG RES, V4
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 60812 IEC
[6]   Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in airline maintenance, repair & overhaul [J].
Asadi, Hamed ;
Yu, Denny ;
Mott, John H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2019, 70 :107-115
[7]   An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis [J].
Bowles, JB .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :380-386
[8]  
Braglia M., 2003, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V20, P503, DOI 10.1108/02656710310468687
[9]   Interactions of personal and occupational risk factors on hand grip strength of winter pruners [J].
Cakmak, Bulent ;
Ergul, Engin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2018, 67 :192-200
[10]   Reliability in automotive electronics: a case study applied to diesel engine control [J].
Cassanelli, G ;
Fantini, F ;
Serra, G ;
Sgatti, S .
MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2003, 43 (9-11) :1411-1416