A new method to simultaneously estimate the radius of a cylindrical object and the wave propagation velocity from GPR data

被引:86
作者
Ristic, Aleksandar Vaso [1 ]
Petrovacki, Dusan [1 ]
Govedarica, Miro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Tech Sci, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
关键词
Radar scan; Hyperbolic reflection; Least squares fitting; Cylindrical object radius; Propagation velocity; SOIL-WATER CONTENT; RADAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2009.01.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present a new method to simultaneously estimate cylindrical object radius (R) and electromagnetic (EM) wave propagation velocity (nu) from ground penetrating radar (GPR) data. R estimation methods have been investigated since the middle of the previous decade, but studies have become more intensive and important over the last several years since they increase the utility of GPR data and enable new GPR applications. Since existing methods, according to the author's best knowledge, are based on a priori known nu, the proposed method has an advantage: it eliminates the measurement of nu and its influence on R estimation quality. Estimating nu accurately results in better soil characterisation. Three steps are used to simultaneously estimate nu and R. First, using the extracted raw data, the coordinates of the hyperbola apex (x(0), t(0)) are estimated. Second, the boundary speed (nu(0)) is estimated, based on the previous results. In the final step, nu is reduced from nu(0) to a predefined nu(min). From the analysis of propagation velocity choice criterion, an optimal nu is chosen, which is used to calculate a unique R. This proposed method is a nonlinear least squares fitting procedure. The method is implemented and verified, using data collected under real conditions, in a Matlab environment. A comparison of the proposed and existing methods shows that the new method is significantly more accurate and robust with regard to noise and the amount of raw data. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1620 / 1630
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Neural detection of pipe signatures in ground penetrating radar images [J].
Gamba, P ;
Lossani, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 38 (02) :790-797
[12]  
Halir R, 1998, WSCG '98, VOL 1, P125
[13]  
Huisman JA, 2003, VADOSE ZONE J, V2, P476, DOI 10.2113/2.4.476
[14]   STATISTICAL BIAS OF CONIC FITTING AND RENORMALIZATION [J].
KANATANI, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1994, 16 (03) :320-326
[15]   AN ALGORITHM FOR LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF NONLINEAR PARAMETERS [J].
MARQUARDT, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1963, 11 (02) :431-441
[16]   COMPUTING A TRUST REGION STEP [J].
MORE, JJ ;
SORENSEN, DC .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC AND STATISTICAL COMPUTING, 1983, 4 (03) :553-572
[17]   Direct and specific least-square fitting of hyperbolae and ellipses [J].
O'Leary, P .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING, 2004, 13 (03) :492-503
[18]   Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar [J].
Olhoeft, GR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 43 (2-4) :175-187
[19]  
Petrovacki D, 2007, P 11 TMT C TRENDS DE
[20]  
Shihab S, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, VOLS 1 AND 2, P319