共 50 条
Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit
被引:19
|作者:
Ho, Chen-Jui
[1
]
Lin, Chih-Hsiang
[1
]
Lu, Yan-Ting
[1
]
Shih, Fu-Yuan
[2
]
Hsu, Che-Wei
[1
]
Tsai, Wan-Chen
[1
]
Tsai, Meng-Han
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurol, 123 Dapi Rd, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词:
Status epilepticus;
Refractory status epilepticus;
Perampanel;
AMPA;
Intensive care unit;
Prognosis;
NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS;
MORTALITY;
SCORE;
D O I:
10.1007/s12028-019-00704-9
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background/ObjectivePerampanel is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) which acts as a non-competitive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist to reduce glutamate-mediated postsynaptic excitation. Previous animal studies and a few case reports/series have suggested that it may be effective to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients with RSE, of whom 22 received perampanel. The clinical features, epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus, status epilepticus severity score, seizure control, functional outcome, RSE etiology, and electroencephalogram findings were collected. Responder to perampanel was defined as seizure resolution within 4days of therapy with perampanel being the last AED used plus no recurrence during hospitalization.ResultsEight of the 22 (36.4%) RSE patients fulfilled the definition of responder to perampanel. An additional 1 patient responded to perampanel after 4days of treatment. In total, perampanel was the last AED in 9 (40.1%) patients. Among the 8 responders to perampanel, 5 had convulsive SE, 1 had non-convulsive SE, and 2 had focal motor SE. The responders accounted for both of the patients with focal motor SE (100%), 5 (33.3%) of the 15 patients with convulsive SE, and 1 (20%) of the 5 patients with non-convulsive SE. The ictal and inter-ictal activities also decreased after perampanel therapy, and three patients (13.6%) had preferable outcomes at last follow-up.ConclusionsPerampanel may be an effective add-on treatment for RSE even in patients who failed multiple AEDs. Our study suggests that perampanel may be more effective for focal motor SE and convulsive SE than non-convulsive SE. As most previous studies have focused on non-convulsive SE, further studies are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of perampanel for different subtypes of SE.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文