25 years of Dutch IPOs: An examination of frequently cited IPO anomalies within main sectors and during hot- and cold-issue periods

被引:2
作者
Doeswijk, R. Q.
Hemmes, H. S. K.
Venekamp, R. H.
机构
[1] Robobank, IRIS, NL-3000 BG Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Robeco, NL-3000 BG Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Fortis Meespierson, NL-1000 AG Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Robeco, NL-3000 AZ Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ECONOMIST-NETHERLANDS | 2006年 / 154卷 / 03期
关键词
Dutch stock market; IPO; hot- and cold-issue periods; initial underpricing; long-term underperformance;
D O I
10.1007/s10645-006-9017-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the existence of the initial underpricing and the long-term underperformance anomalies in the Dutch IPO market between 1977 and 2001. We found an average initial underpricing level of 17.6%, measured relative to a sector-specific benchmark. The median initial return was 5.0%, while there were negative initial returns in only 17% of the IPOs. During their first 3 years of listing, IPOs on average underperformed their benchmark by a cumulative 10.0%, but this result is statistically insignificant. The period 1997-beginning of 2000 was a true hot-issue period for growth stocks: their level of initial underpricing was 35.8%, compared to 9.2% during cold-issue periods. These growth IPOs also significantly underperformed their benchmark by 38.4% after 3 years.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 427
页数:23
相关论文
共 29 条