The plurality of farmers' views on soil management calls for a policy mix

被引:28
作者
Braito, Michael [1 ]
Leonhardt, Heidi [2 ]
Penker, Marianne [2 ]
Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, Elisabeth [2 ]
Thaler, Georg [2 ]
Flint, Courtney G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Inst Sustainable Econ Dev, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Feistmantelstr 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Sustainable Econ Dev, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Feistmantelstr 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Sociol Social Work & Anthropol, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Farmers' viewpoints; Soil management; Q methodology; Farmer behavior; Soil conservation policy; ENVIRONMENTAL SCHEME PARTICIPATION; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; FARMING STYLES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LAND-USE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MOTIVATES FARMERS; Q-METHODOLOGY; CAP REFORM; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104876
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
While soil degradation is continuing to threaten the global agricultural production system, a common understanding of how to encourage sustainable soil management is missing. With this study, we aim to provide new insights on targeted policies that address the heterogeneity of farmers. We scrutinized the plurality of views on soil management among arable farmers in the Austrian (and European) policy context. To do so, we applied Q methodology, a method that identifies different perspectives on a topic present in a population and analyzes this subjectivity statistically. We interviewed 34 arable land farmers who varied in their farming backgrounds. The results yielded four different viewpoints on soil management held by the interviewed farmers: two rather ecocentric perspectives (Nature Participants, Pleasure Seekers) and two rather anthropocentric perspectives (Traditional Food Providers, Profit Maximizers). Our study shows that farmers' soil management is influenced by more than economic considerations and suggests that a mix of policy approaches is needed to reach all farmers and avoid adverse effects of excluding farmers. We provide several suggestions for policymakers on how to complement agri-environmental policies: appealing to human-nature relationships, offering training and experimentation services, fostering social networks, and raising the social reputation of farmers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ROADM INCR COV CROP
[2]  
[Anonymous], J ENV PLAN MANAG
[3]  
Arbuckle J.G., 2012, ATTITUDES COVER CROP, P12
[4]   What motivates farmers to participate in the Nova Scotia environmental farm plan program? Evidence and environmental policy implications [J].
Atari, Dominic O. A. ;
Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. ;
Smale, Shawn ;
Duinker, Peter N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (02) :1269-1279
[5]  
Barbayiannis N., 2009, CASE STUDY GREECE SU
[6]   Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers' Decision-Making [J].
Bartkowski, Bartosz ;
Bartke, Stephan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
[7]   The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management [J].
Batary, Peter ;
Dicks, Lynn V. ;
Kleijn, David ;
Sutherland, William J. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) :1006-1016
[8]   Sustainability policy as if people mattered: developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change [J].
Baum C.M. ;
Gross C. .
Journal of Bioeconomics, 2017, 19 (1) :53-95
[9]   Farmer perception of runoff and erosion and extent of flooding in the silt-loam belt of the Belgian Walloon Region [J].
Bielders, CL ;
Ramelot, C ;
Persoons, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (01) :85-93
[10]  
BMLFUW, 2019, GRUN BER 2019 SIT OS