Role of DNA damage response pathways in preventing carcinogenesis caused by intrinsic replication stress

被引:16
|
作者
Wallace, M. D. [1 ,2 ]
Southard, T. L. [1 ,3 ]
Schimenti, K. J. [1 ]
Schimenti, J. C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Coll Vet Med, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Sect Anat Pathol, Ithaca, NY USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Ctr Vertebrate Genom, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
DNA replication; DNA damage checkpoints; minichromosome maintenance proteins; 9-1-1; MCM2-7; helicase; replication stress; ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA; BREAST-CANCER; TUMOR SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; IONIZING-RADIATION; MOUSE MODEL; ATM; MICE; CHK2; PHOSPHORYLATION;
D O I
10.1038/onc.2013.339
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Defective DNA replication can result in genomic instability, cancer and developmental defects. To understand the roles of DNA damage response (DDR) genes on carcinogenesis in mutants defective for core DNA replication components, we utilized the Mcm4Chaos3/Chaos3 ('Chaos3') mouse model that, by virtue of an amino-acid alteration in MCM4 that destabilizes the MCM2-7 DNA replicative helicase, has fewer dormant replication origins and an increased number of stalled replication forks. This leads to genomic instability and cancer in most Chaos3 mice. We found that animals doubly mutant for Chaos3 and components of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) double-strand break response pathway (Atm, p21/Cdkn1a and Chk2/Chek2) had decreased tumor latency and/or increased tumor susceptibility. Tumor latency and susceptibility differed between genetic backgrounds and genders, with females demonstrating an overall greater cancer susceptibility to Atm and p21 deficiency than males. Atm deficiency was semilethal in the Chaos3 background and impaired embryonic fibroblast proliferation, suggesting that ATM drug inhibitors might be useful against tumors with DNA replication defects. Hypomorphism for the 9-1-1 component Hus1 did not affect tumor latency or susceptibility in Chaos3 animals, and tumors in these mice did not exhibit impaired ATR pathway signaling. These and other data indicate that under conditions of systemic replication stress, the ATM pathway is particularly important both for cancer suppression and viability during development.
引用
收藏
页码:3688 / 3695
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of DNA damage response pathways in preventing carcinogenesis caused by intrinsic replication stress
    M D Wallace
    T L Southard
    K J Schimenti
    J C Schimenti
    Oncogene, 2014, 33 : 3688 - 3695
  • [2] Targeting the DNA Damage Response Pathways and Replication Stress in Colorectal Cancer
    Durinikova, Erika
    Reilly, Nicole M.
    Buzo, Kristi
    Mariella, Elisa
    Chila, Rosaria
    Lorenzato, Annalisa
    Dias, Joao M. L.
    Grasso, Gaia
    Pisati, Federica
    Lamba, Simona
    Corti, Giorgio
    Degasperi, Andrea
    Cancelliere, Carlotta
    Mauri, Gianluca
    Andrei, Pietro
    Linnebacher, Michael
    Marsoni, Silvia
    Siena, Salvatore
    Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea
    Nik-Zainal, Serena
    Di Nicolantonio, Federica
    Bardelli, Alberto
    Arena, Sabrina
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (17) : 3874 - 3889
  • [3] The Role of the Transcriptional Response to DNA Replication Stress
    Herlihy, Anna E.
    de Bruin, Robertus A. M.
    GENES, 2017, 8 (03):
  • [4] Role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in human carcinogenesis
    Kryston, Thomas B.
    Georgiev, Anastassiya B.
    Pissis, Polycarpos
    Georgakilas, Alexandros G.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2011, 711 (1-2) : 193 - 201
  • [5] Chemotherapy induced DNA damage response Convergence of drugs and pathways
    Woods, Derek
    Turchi, John J.
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2013, 14 (05) : 379 - 389
  • [6] Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins: From DNA Replication to the DNA Damage Response
    Malysa, Agnes
    Zhang, Xiaohong Mary
    Bepler, Gerold
    CELLS, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [7] Activation of DNA Damage Response Pathways during Lytic Replication of KSHV
    Hollingworth, Robert
    Skalka, George L.
    Stewart, Grant S.
    Hislop, Andrew D.
    Blackbourn, David J.
    Grand, Roger J.
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2015, 7 (06): : 2908 - 2927
  • [8] Targeting DNA Damage Response and Replication Stress in Pancreatic Cancer
    Dreyer, Stephan B.
    Upstill-Goddard, Rosie
    Paulus-Hock, Viola
    Paris, Clara
    Lampraki, Eirini-Maria
    Dray, Eloise
    Serrels, Bryan
    Caligiuri, Giuseppina
    Rebus, Selma
    Plenker, Dennis
    Galluzzo, Zachary
    Brunton, Holly
    Cunningham, Richard
    Tesson, Mathias
    Nourse, Craig
    Bailey, Ulla-Maja
    Jones, Marc
    Moran-Jones, Kim
    Wright, Derek W.
    Duthie, Fraser
    Oien, Karin
    Evers, Lisa
    McKay, Colin J.
    McGregor, Grant A.
    Gulati, Aditi
    Brough, Rachel
    Bajrami, Ilirjana
    Pettitt, Stephan
    Dziubinski, Michele L.
    Candido, Juliana
    Balkwill, Frances
    Barry, Simon T.
    Grutzmann, Robert
    Rahib, Lola
    Johns, Amber
    Pajic, Marina
    Froeling, Fieke E. M.
    Beer, Phillip
    Musgrove, Elizabeth A.
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    Ashworth, Alan
    Frame, Margaret C.
    Crawford, Howard C.
    Simeone, Diane M.
    Lord, Chris
    Mukhopadhyay, Debabrata
    Pilarsky, Christian
    Tuveson, David A.
    Cooke, Susanna L.
    Jamieson, Nigel B.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (01) : 362 - +
  • [9] Modulation of inflammation and disease tolerance by DNA damage response pathways
    Neves-Costa, Ana
    Moita, Luis F.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2017, 284 (05) : 680 - 698
  • [10] DNA replication and replication stress response in the context of nuclear architecture
    Gonzalez-Acosta, Daniel
    Lopes, Massimo
    CHROMOSOMA, 2024, 133 (01) : 57 - 75