A comparative review on mobile robot path planning: Classical or meta-heuristic methods?

被引:130
|
作者
Ab Wahab, Mohd Nadhir [1 ]
Nefti-Meziani, Samia [2 ]
Atyabi, Adham [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Comp Sci, George Town, Malaysia
[2] Univ Salford, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Comp Sci, Colorado Springs, CO USA
关键词
Path planning; Classical; Meta-heuristic; Mobile robot; Navigation; CUCKOO SEARCH; NEURAL-NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; NAVIGATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.10.001
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The involvement of Meta-heuristic algorithms in robot motion planning has attracted the attention of researchers in the robotics community due to the simplicity of the approaches and their effectiveness in the coordination of the agents. This study explores the implementation of many meta-heuristic algorithms, e.g. Genetic Algorithm (GA), Differential Evolution (DE), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA) in multiple motion planning scenarios. The study provides comparison between multiple meta-heuristic approaches against a set of well-known conventional motion planning and navigation techniques such as Dijkstra's Algorithm (DA), Probabilistic Road Map (PRM), Rapidly Random Tree (RRT) and Potential Field (PF). Two experimental environments with difficult to manipulate layouts are used to examine the feasibility of the methods listed. several performance measures such as total travel time, number of collisions, travel distances, energy consumption and displacement errors are considered for assessing feasibility of the motion planning algorithms considered in the study. The results show the competitiveness of meta-heuristic approaches against conventional methods. Dijkstra 's Algorithm (DA) is considered a benchmark solution and Constricted Particle Swarm Optimization (CPSO) is found performing better than other meta-heuristic approaches in unknown environments.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 252
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Heuristic Elastic Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning
    Wang, Haiyan
    Zhou, Zhiyu
    INFORMATION, 2019, 10 (03)
  • [22] Quantitative Performance Review of Wheeled Mobile Robot Path Planning Algorithms
    Martins, Oluwaseun Opeyemi
    Adekunle, Adefemi Adeyemi
    Adejuyigbe, Samuel Babatope
    Adeyemi, Oluwole Hezekiah
    GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (03): : 765 - 785
  • [23] A comparative study of meta-heuristics for local path planning of a mobile robot
    Pattnaik, S. K.
    Mishra, D.
    Panda, S.
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 54 (01) : 134 - 152
  • [24] A review of mobile robot motion planning methods: from classical motion planning workflows to reinforcement learning-based architectures
    Dong, Lu
    He, Zichen
    Song, Chunwei
    Sun, Changyin
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS, 2023, 34 (02) : 439 - 459
  • [25] Mobile Robot Path Planning Based on Ant Colony Algorithm With A* Heuristic Method
    Dai, Xiaolin
    Long, Shuai
    Zhang, Zhiwen
    Gong, Dawei
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS, 2019, 13
  • [26] A comparative study of geometric path planning methods for a mobile robot: Potential field and Voronoi diagrams
    Jacinto Gomez, Edwar
    Martinez Santa, Fernando
    Martinez Sarmiento, Fredy Hernan
    2013 II INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF ENGINEERING MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (CIIMA), 2013,
  • [27] Optimizing path planning in mobile robot systems using motion capture technology
    Al-Kamil, Safa Jameel
    Szabolcsi, Robert
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 22
  • [28] Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Mobile Robot Path Planning
    Kim, Changwon
    Kim, Yeesock
    Yi, Hak
    ELECTRONICS, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [29] A review of meta-heuristic algorithms for reactive power planning problem
    Shaheen, Abdullah M.
    Spea, Shimaa R.
    Farrag, Sobhy M.
    Abido, Mohammed A.
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 9 (02) : 215 - 231
  • [30] Path Planning Techniques for Mobile Robots: A Review
    Mohanty, Prases K.
    Singh, Anand Kumar
    Kumar, Amit
    Mahto, Manjeet Kumar
    Kundu, Shubhasri
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (SOCPAR 2021), 2022, 417 : 657 - 667