Sector-based political analysis of energy transition: Green shift in the forest policy regime in France

被引:18
作者
Sergent, Arnaud [1 ]
机构
[1] Irstea Inst Natl Rech Sci & Technol Environm & Ag, F-33612 Bordeaux, Cestas, France
关键词
Energy transition; Sector; Forest policy regime; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; GOVERNANCE; INSIGHTS; INDUSTRIES; INNOVATION; BIOENERGY; TYPOLOGY; FUELWOOD; DYNAMICS; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines energy transition political process from a sector-based approach, through the analysis of recent shift in the French forest policy regime. We demonstrate that, since 2007, energy transition policies have led to a harvesting turn within the French forest policy framework, meaning that priority is given to wood mobilisation, mainly for biomass uses. In addition, our findings suggest that the political authority wielded by the state over forest policy has shifted from forest administrative services to energy agencies and local authorities. Finally, we show that, although implementation of the harvesting turn is a cause of sectoral and inter-sectoral tensions, energy transition challenge also contributes to a process of (re)institutionalisation of mediation relationships among forestry stake-holders and wood-based industries representatives. The article concludes by arguing that sectors should retain relevant institutional frameworks for actors when choosing political arrangements required for implementing energy transition policy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 500
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways [J].
Geels, Frank W. ;
Schot, Johan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (03) :399-417
[22]   Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies [J].
Geels, Frank W. ;
Kemp, Rene .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (04) :441-455
[23]   From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems - Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (6-7) :897-920
[24]   Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (8-9) :1257-1274
[25]   The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture. Conceptual understanding and implications for transition management [J].
Grin, John .
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2012, 15 (1-2) :72-89
[26]   Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void [J].
Hajer, M .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2003, 36 (02) :175-195
[27]  
Hoberg G., 2011, SEARCH SUSTAINABILIT
[28]   Policy subsystem configurations and policy change: Operationalizing the postpositivist analysis of the politics of the policy process [J].
Howlett, M ;
Ramesh, M .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1998, 26 (03) :466-481
[29]   From government to governance in forest planning? Lessons from the case of the British Columbia Great Bear Rainforest initiative [J].
Howlett, Michael ;
Rayner, Jeremy ;
Tollefson, Chris .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (5-6) :383-391
[30]  
IEA (International Energy Agency), 2011, Deploying Renewables 2011: Best and Future Policy Practice