Multi-year carbon budget of a mature commercial short rotation coppice willow plantation

被引:8
作者
Morrison, Ross [1 ]
Rowe, Rebecca L. [2 ]
Cooper, Hollie M. [1 ]
McNamara, Niall P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, Oxon, England
[2] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster, England
来源
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 07期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
bioenergy; eddy covariance; net ecosystem carbon balance; net ecosystem carbon dioxide exchange; short rotation coppice; willow; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; LAND-USE CHANGE; EDDY COVARIANCE TECHNIQUE; SOIL CARBON; SONIC ANEMOMETER; FLUX MEASUREMENTS; INVASIVE INSECTS; ANNUAL SUMS; BIOENERGY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1111/gcbb.12608
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Energy derived from second generation perennial energy crops is projected to play an increasingly important role in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Such energy crops are expected to deliver net greenhouse gas emissions reductions through fossil fuel displacement and have potential for increasing soil carbon (C) storage. Despite this, few empirical studies have quantified the ecosystem-level C balance of energy crops and the evidence base to inform energy policy remains limited. Here, the temporal dynamics and magnitude of net ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2) exchange (NEE) were quantified at a mature short rotation coppice (SRC) willow plantation in Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, under commercial growing conditions. Eddy covariance flux observations of NEE were performed over a four-year production cycle and combined with biomass yield data to estimate the net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of the SRC. The magnitude of annual NEE ranged from -147 +/- 70 to -502 +/- 84 g CO2-C m(-2) year(-1) with the magnitude of annual CO2 capture increasing over the production cycle. Defoliation during an unexpected outbreak of willow leaf beetle impacted gross ecosystem production, ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem exchange during the second growth season. The NECB was -87 +/- 303 g CO2-C m(-2) for the complete production cycle after accounting for C export at harvest (1,183 g C m(-2)), and was approximately CO2-C neutral (-21 g CO2-C m(-2) year(-1)) when annualized. The results of this study are consistent with studies of soil organic C which have shown limited changes following conversion to SRC willow. In the context of global decarbonization, the study indicates that the primary benefit of SRC willow production at the site is through displacement of fossil fuel emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 909
页数:15
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out?
    Agostini, Francesco
    Gregory, Andrew S.
    Richter, Goetz M.
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (03) : 1057 - 1080
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ANGEW STAT ANWENDUNG, DOI DOI 10.2307/2533881
  • [3] [Anonymous], REPORT BIOENERGY CRO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis
  • [5] [Anonymous], SOILS GUID ASS
  • [6] [Anonymous], BIOEN INS FUT UK BIO
  • [7] Experimental validation of footprint models for eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements above grassland by means of natural and artificial tracers
    Arriga, Nicola
    Rannik, Ullar
    Aubinet, Marc
    Carrara, Arnaud
    Vesala, Timo
    Papale, Dario
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 242 : 75 - 84
  • [8] Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future
    Baldocchi, DD
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2003, 9 (04) : 479 - 492
  • [9] Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere - the state and future of the eddy covariance method
    Baldocchi, Dennis
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (12) : 3600 - 3609
  • [10] Soil carbon and belowground carbon balance of a short-rotation coppice: assessments from three different approaches
    Berhongaray, Gonzalo
    Verlinden, Melanie S.
    Broeckx, Laura S.
    Janssens, Ivan A.
    Ceulemans, Reinhart
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2017, 9 (02): : 299 - 313