Decolonizing technoscience in northern Scandinavia: the role of scholarship in Sami emancipation and the indigenization of Western science

被引:7
作者
Wrakberg, Urban [1 ]
Granqvist, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Tourism Res & Northern Studies, N-9915 Kirkenes, Norway
关键词
Subarctic; Sami; History of science; Decolonization; Indigenization; Epistemology of science; Traditional knowledge; Indigenous emancipation; REPATRIATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhg.2013.12.005
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The historical geography of the sub-arctic homeland of the Sami indigenous people is characterized by its division among four nations across Scandinavia and the Kola Peninsula of north-western Russia. The aim of this article is to improve the understanding of Sami contributions to Western scholarship and science by discussing their history and epistemological complexity. The Sami provided many types of knowledge as abused, peaceful subjects of colonial study. However, with time they became learned agents able to appropriate, develop and modify Western scholarship and science. The Sami experience of destructive national school policies motivated political action by articulate Sami leaders at the beginning of the 20th century. Given the growing acknowledgment of Sami socioeconomic interests in Scandinavia since the 1980s, disputes and consensus-building are a continuing part of the Sami's coexistence with the majority society and academia. A specific Sami research agenda and stable Sami academic institutions are crucial for continued Sami contributions to the indigenization of Western scholarship. Nevertheless, given its history and the instrumental character of Western science, it is argued that using science as the norm in any interaction with traditional knowledge is highly problematic. For joint research to benefit from both types of knowledge, the rigid methodology and reductionist worldview of Western science must first be recognized and analyzed in terms of Western science's epistemological dogmas, hegemonic practices and funding peculiarities. Improved insights in the history of science facilitate a critical development of indigenous knowledge combining actively chosen adaptations of science and technoscience with traditional knowledge. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 92
页数:12
相关论文
共 117 条
[2]   DISMANTLING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE [J].
AGRAWAL, A .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1995, 26 (03) :413-439
[3]  
Anderson W, 2002, SOC STUD SCI, V32, P643, DOI 10.1177/030631202128967361
[4]   From subjugated knowledge to conjugated subjects: science and globalisation, or postcolonial studies of science? [J].
Anderson, Warwick .
POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES, 2009, 12 (04) :389-400
[5]  
[Anonymous], RECONSIDERING SCIENC
[6]  
[Anonymous], NXRE STEDER NYE RAM
[7]  
[Anonymous], VILLMARK I GRENSELAN
[8]  
[Anonymous], THE IDEA OF CULTURAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], AWAKENED VOICE THE R
[10]  
[Anonymous], CHASING TECHNOSCIENC