Arbitration and Public Policy 2016 Goff Lecture

被引:1
作者
French, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] High Court Australia, Parkes, ACT, Australia
关键词
Arbitration; commercial arbitration; public policy; arbitrability; Lord Goff; UNCITRAL Model Law;
D O I
10.1080/10192577.2016.1198542
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Commercial arbitration being contractually based is a matter of private law. Its effectiveness depends upon legislative support defined by external public policy considerations. Those considerations invite scrutiny of the costs and benefits of commercial arbitration including its effect on the development of commercial law and an appropriate balance between arbitral mechanisms and commercial courts. The growth of commercial arbitration and its application in sensitive areas such as consumer contracts of adhesion may enliven public policy responses. Internal constraints in relation to arbitrability and public policy limits on enforcement play a part in enabling arbitration to function in a way that is sensitive to the larger social and political environment in which it is conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Bathurst CJ, 2013, COMMUNICATION
  • [2] Department of Justice of the HKSAR, 2007, CONS PAP REF LAW ARB, pix
  • [3] Jones Doug, 2013, COMMERCIAL ARBITRATI
  • [4] Kaufmann-Kohler G., 2007, ARBIT INT, V23, P357
  • [5] Kaufmann-Kohler Gabrielle, 2007, ARBITRATION INT, V23, P372
  • [6] Leslie CR, 2015, TEX LAW REV, V94, P265
  • [7] Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, 2016, BAILL LECT
  • [8] Mourre Alexis, 2013, RISE TRANSPARENCY IN, P62
  • [9] Mustill, 1989, LAW PRACTICE COMMERC, P4
  • [10] Neuberger, 2015, COMMUNICATION