How should we measure the impact of chronic pain? Limitations of utility measurement using the EQ-5D and SF-6D

被引：6
|
作者：
Schofield, Deborah J. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW 1450, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Camperdown, NSW 1450, Australia
来源：
PAIN | 2014年 / 155卷 / 10期
关键词：
PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; HEALTH; PATIENT;
D O I：
10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.020
中图分类号：
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号：
100217 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1918 / 1919
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey
    Cunillera, Oriol
    Tresserras, Ricard
    Rajmil, Luis
    Vilagut, Gemma
    Brugulat, Pilar
    Herdman, Mike
    Mompart, Anna
    Medina, Antonia
    Pardo, Yolanda
    Alonso, Jordi
    Brazier, John
    Ferrer, Montse
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (06) : 853 - 864
  • [22] The Responsiveness of Quality of Life Utilities to Change in Depression: A Comparison of Instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD)
    Gerhards, Sylvia A. H.
    Huibers, Marcus J. H.
    Theunissen, Kevin A. T. M.
    de Graaf, L. Esther
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : 732 - 739
  • [23] Using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale to Estimate Health State Utility Values: Mapping from the MSIS-29, Version 2, to the EQ-5D and the SF-6D
    Hawton, Annie
    Green, Colin
    Telford, Claire
    Zajicek, John
    Wright, Dave
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (08) : 1084 - 1091
  • [24] Comparison of Contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D Responses Using Scoring Algorithms Derived from Similar Valuation Exercises
    Whitehurst, David G. T.
    Norman, Richard
    Brazier, John E.
    Viney, Rosalie
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (05) : 570 - 577
  • [25] The Impact of Differences in EQ-5D and SF-6D Utility Scores on the Acceptability of Cost-Utility Ratios: Results across Five Trial-Based Cost-Utility Studies
    Joore, Manuela
    Brunenberg, Danielle
    Nelemans, Patricia
    Wouters, Emiel
    Kuijpers, Petra
    Honig, Adriaan
    Willems, Danielle
    de Leeuw, Peter
    Severens, Johan
    Boonen, Annelies
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (02) : 222 - 229
  • [26] Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D (SF-12) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with cardiovascular disease
    Kularatna, Sanjeewa
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Chan, Yih Kai
    Ski, Chantal F.
    Carrington, Melinda
    Thompson, David
    Stewart, Simon
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (12) : 3399 - 3408
  • [27] Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: A secondary analysis of patient data
    Mukuria, Clara
    Brazier, John
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 77 : 97 - 105
  • [28] A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain
    Ye, Ziping
    Sun, Lihua
    Wang, Qi
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [29] An empirical evaluation of the SF-12, SF-6D, EQ-5D and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hand
    Dritsaki, Melina
    Petrou, Stavros
    Williams, Mark
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [30] The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Meadows, Keith
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
12345